Adds a new `default_field_map` field to trained model config objects.
This allows the model creator to supply field map if it knows that there should be some map for inference to work directly against the training data.
The use case internally is having analytics jobs supply a field mapping for multi-field fields. This allows us to use the model "out of the box" on data where we trained on `foo.keyword` but the `_source` only references `foo`.
This adds machine learning model feature importance calculations to the inference processor.
The new flag in the configuration matches the analytics parameter name: `num_top_feature_importance_values`
Example:
```
"inference": {
"field_mappings": {},
"model_id": "my_model",
"inference_config": {
"regression": {
"num_top_feature_importance_values": 3
}
}
}
```
This will write to the document as follows:
```
"inference" : {
"feature_importance" : {
"FlightTimeMin" : -76.90955548511226,
"FlightDelayType" : 114.13514762158526,
"DistanceMiles" : 13.731580450792187
},
"predicted_value" : 108.33165831875137,
"model_id" : "my_model"
}
```
This is done through calculating the [SHAP values](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03888).
It requires that models have populated `number_samples` for each tree node. This is not available to models that were created before 7.7.
Additionally, if the inference config is requesting feature_importance, and not all nodes have been upgraded yet, it will not allow the pipeline to be created. This is to safe-guard in a mixed-version environment where only some ingest nodes have been upgraded.
NOTE: the algorithm is a Java port of the one laid out in ml-cpp: https://github.com/elastic/ml-cpp/blob/master/lib/maths/CTreeShapFeatureImportance.cc
usability blocked by: https://github.com/elastic/ml-cpp/pull/991
Benjamin Trent
David Kyle
István Zoltán Szabó