Changes:
* Use "geopoint" when not referring to the literal field type
* Use "geoshape" when not referring to the literal field type or query type
* Use "GeoJSON" consistently
* Removes docs and references for the following `geo_shape` mapping parameters:
* `tree`
* `tree_levels`
* `strategy`
* `distance_error_pct`
* Updates a related breaking change.
Relates to #70850
When the enrich processor appends enrich data to an incoming document,
it adds a `target_field` to contain the enrich data.
This `target_field` contains both the `match_field` AND `enrich_fields`
specified in the enrich policy.
Previously, this was reflected in the documented example but not
explicitly stated. This adds several explicit statements to the docs.
Prior to this change the `target_field` would always be a json array
field in the document being ingested. This to take into account that
multiple enrich documents could be inserted into the `target_field`.
However the default `max_matches` is `1`. Meaning that by default
only a single enrich document would be added to `target_field` json
array field.
This commit changes this; if `max_matches` is set to `1` then the single
document would be added as a json object to the `target_field` and
if it is configured to a higher value then the enrich documents will be
added as a json array (even if a single enrich document happens to be
enriched).
Besides a rename, this changes allows to processor to attach multiple
enrich docs to the document being ingested.
Also in order to control the maximum number of enrich docs to be
included in the document being ingested, the `max_matches` setting
is added to the enrich processor.
Relates #32789
Enrich processor configuration changes:
* Renamed `enrich_key` option to `field` option.
* Replaced `set_from` and `targets` options with `target_field`.
The `target_field` option behaves different to how `set_from` and
`targets` worked. The `target_field` is the field that will contain
the looked up document.
Relates to #32789
If a pipeline that refrences the policy exists, we should not allow the
policy to be deleted. The user will need to remove the processor from
the pipeline before deleting the policy. This commit adds a check to
ensure that the policy cannot be deleted if it is referenced by any
pipeline in the system.
James Rodewig
James Rodewig
Martijn van Groningen
Michael Basnight