Looks like at some point django changed the admin tool from
"django-admin" to "django-admin.py"
Possibly this changed in upstream in Django on this commit, though I
don't know for certain:
85efc14a2e
Previously, fpm would use `pip download ... --build ...` to instruct pip
to unpack a given python package to a specific directory for the purpose
of running something like `python setup.py` from it.
However, somewhere in 2021, pip removed this flag. First, I think, it
was deprecated and ignored, then finally removed. One reference to
this removal in the upstream pip project is this issue:
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/8333
Without `--build`, pip will place a single tarball in the destination
directory. Fpm cannot easily predict the name of this file because we
don't know the "real" name of the python package nor do we know the
version number being downloaded.
For example:
```
% python3 -m pip download --no-binary :all: --no-deps --no-clean django
...
Successfully downloaded django
% ls
Django-4.0.4.tar.gz
```
Best guess:
* we can expect exactly one file in the previously-empty target directory
* we can also expect that it is a .tar.gz
I don't know if these guesses are always correct, but it's a start.
As of this commit, the following command generates a Debian package:
`fpm -s python --python-bin python3 -t deb django`
Prior to this commit, with a newer version of pip, the command would
fail.
Fixes#1831
Fixes the mangling FPM performs on the contents of RPM %files lists
to better match RPM's idiosyncratic filename handling. FPM now
recognizes more cases that require special handling, and it
correctly distinguishes between the glob and non-glob cases,
which RPM itself treates differently.
Fixes#1385
Previously, we would pass the literal `""` as an argument to `tar`.
`tar` would interpret this as a file name, which does not exist, and
fail.
This fixes the command to just pass no compression flag at all to tar
when `--deb-compression none` is set.
I did not add tests since I couldn't figure out how to execute them -
this is my first time working in ruby.
A prior commit removed `rake` as a development dependency on the
assumption that nothing in fpm's development process actually required
the use of `rake`.
However, I had forgotten about #756 (year 2014) which adds FPM::RakeTask
and some test coverage. FPM::RakeTask was added to allow folks to more
easily invoke FPM from within a Rake task.
At this time, I see no reason to remove FPM::RakeTask. Further, because
`rake` is typically (in my experience) used only in development
environments. Therefore, I believe the right solution is to restore
`rake` as a development_dependency in order to allow the test suite to
pass. For users of FPM::RakeTask, I would assume (hopefully correctly!)
that they already have `rake` installed as a dependency in their own
project, so the `fpm` gem has no need to specify `rake` as a general-use
dependency.
When studying newer versions of Rake, I found:
* Rake v13 requires Ruby 2.2 or newer.
* Rake v12.xx and older are flagged as having security vulnerabilities.
In order to minimize chaos, this commit adds an unversioned dependency
on rake. This is to help fpm service more versions of Ruby and resist
efforts by any dependency to dictate which version of Ruby is used.
This reverts db9db670c3.
Fixes#1877
When converting, we check if the original package was of a certain type.
In order for those types/constants to be available, we have to require
those files.
Test cases which now work correctly with this commit, but had failed
prior:
% bundle exec ruby -r./lib/fpm/package/rpm.rb -e 'FPM::Package::RPM.new.tap { |x| x.name = "fancy" }.convert(FPM::Package::RPM)'
% bundle exec ruby -r./lib/fpm/package/deb.rb -e 'FPM::Package::Deb.new.tap { |x| x.name = "fancy" }.convert(FPM::Package::Deb)'
Fixes#1854
Prior to this change, pip would download Python packages to $PWD which
leaves files hanging around.
The build_path is automatically removed when fpm exits.
As part of making "internal pip" the default (#1820), the test suite
needed two main changes:
1) Don't check for easy_install anymore
2) Try to find the right python executable.
On my Ubuntu 20.04 system, installing Python gives Python v3 which only
makes the "python3" executable available. To compensate, the test suite
now tries to find any of "python", "python2", or "python3" to use with
the test suite. When found, it will set the appropriate `--python-bin`
flag in fpm for each test.
For #1820
This adds a new flag, --python-internal-pip, which is enabled by default.
"internal pip" means using 'python -m pip' to invoke pip. Ideally this will make fpm more correctly use pip.
Tested on python 2.7.17 and 3.6.9 on Ubuntu 18.04
All python tests passing 👍👍Fixes#1820
This should silence a warning in cases when packages do not contain any
/etc files. Prior to this commit, most debian package creation would
have this warning emitted:
```
Debian packaging tools generally labels all files in /etc as config files, as mandated by policy, so fpm defaults to this behavior for deb packages. You can disable this default behavior with --deb-no-default-config-files flag {:level=>:warn}
```
Fixes#1851
This feels like the right default because empty packages have no files
(especially no binary, architecture-specific files) and therefore should
be installable on any architecture.
Fixes#1846
This changes the Dockerfile to create docker images suitable for running tests (fpm rspec suite in docker) and also as a normal release (using fpm through docker).
Fixes#1682, #1453
https://blog.readthedocs.com/build-errors-docutils-0-18/
For #1848
Hoping this fixes it. Readthedocs emails me whenever doc build fails, and
for the past week or two, it has said the following:
```
Running Sphinx v1.8.5
loading translations [en]... done
making output directory...
building [mo]: targets for 0 po files that are out of date
building [html]: targets for 37 source files that are out of date
updating environment: 37 added, 0 changed, 0 removed
reading sources... [ 2%] changelog
reading sources... [ 5%] changelog_links
reading sources... [ 8%] cli-reference
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/fpm/envs/latest/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/cmd/build.py", line 304, in build_main
app.build(args.force_all, filenames)
[ ... cut for brevity ... ]
File "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/fpm/envs/latest/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/util/nodes.py", line 94, in apply_source_workaround
for classifier in reversed(node.parent.traverse(nodes.classifier)):
TypeError: argument to reversed() must be a sequence
```
I needed found this issue while trying to write documentation and
examples for fpm's cpan support. Fpm was generating invalid debian
packages as a result! This should fix things.
This example uses the `ascii-art` npm package. I have realized that
using this package with its example ascii art is likely not accessible
for screen readers. I'll keep the example for now and revise it later.
Jordan Sissel
mszprejda
John Bollinger
John Howard
Corey Quinn
Geoff Beier
seph