Add latest changes from gitlab-org/security/gitlab@15-7-stable-ee

This commit is contained in:
GitLab Bot 2023-03-01 18:34:52 +00:00
parent d8de601662
commit f5d158fe8b
5 changed files with 44 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ class Integration < ApplicationRecord
end
def api_field_names
fields.reject { _1[:type] == 'password' }.pluck(:name)
fields.reject { _1[:type] == 'password' || _1[:name] == 'webhook' }.pluck(:name)
end
def form_fields

View File

@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ module ResourceAccessTokens
def do_not_allow_owner_access_level_for_project_bot?(access_level)
resource.is_a?(Project) &&
access_level == Gitlab::Access::OWNER &&
access_level.to_i == Gitlab::Access::OWNER &&
!current_user.can?(:manage_owners, resource)
end
end

View File

@ -249,6 +249,15 @@ To expose the integration in the [REST API](../../api/integrations.md):
You can also refer to our [REST API style guide](../api_styleguide.md).
Sensitive fields are not exposed over the API. Sensitive fields are those fields that contain any of the following in their name:
- `key`
- `passphrase`
- `password`
- `secret`
- `token`
- `webhook`
#### GraphQL API
Integrations use the `Types::Projects::ServiceType` type by default,

View File

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
require 'spec_helper'
RSpec.describe Integration do
RSpec.describe Integration, feature_category: :integrations do
using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
let_it_be(:group) { create(:group) }
@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ RSpec.describe Integration do
{ name: 'api_key', type: 'password' },
{ name: 'password', type: 'password' },
{ name: 'password_field', type: 'password' },
{ name: 'webhook' },
{ name: 'some_safe_field' },
{ name: 'safe_field' },
{ name: 'url' },
@ -879,6 +880,7 @@ RSpec.describe Integration do
field :api_key, type: 'password'
field :password, type: 'password'
field :password_field, type: 'password'
field :webhook
field :some_safe_field
field :safe_field
field :url
@ -1088,6 +1090,8 @@ RSpec.describe Integration do
field :bar, type: 'password'
field :password
field :webhook
field :with_help, help: -> { 'help' }
field :select, type: 'select'
field :boolean, type: 'checkbox'
@ -1138,7 +1142,7 @@ RSpec.describe Integration do
it 'registers fields in the fields list' do
expect(integration.fields.pluck(:name)).to match_array %w[
foo foo_p foo_dt bar password with_help select boolean
foo foo_p foo_dt bar password with_help select boolean webhook
]
expect(integration.api_field_names).to match_array %w[
@ -1153,6 +1157,7 @@ RSpec.describe Integration do
have_attributes(name: 'foo_dt', type: 'text'),
have_attributes(name: 'bar', type: 'password'),
have_attributes(name: 'password', type: 'password'),
have_attributes(name: 'webhook', type: 'text'),
have_attributes(name: 'with_help', help: 'help'),
have_attributes(name: 'select', type: 'select'),
have_attributes(name: 'boolean', type: 'checkbox')

View File

@ -27,6 +27,13 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceAccessTokens::CreateService do
end
end
shared_examples 'correct error message' do
it 'returns correct error message' do
expect(subject.error?).to be true
expect(subject.errors).to include(error_message)
end
end
shared_examples 'allows creation of bot with valid params' do
it { expect { subject }.to change { User.count }.by(1) }
@ -200,16 +207,11 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceAccessTokens::CreateService do
end
context 'when invalid scope is passed' do
let(:error_message) { 'Scopes can only contain available scopes' }
let_it_be(:params) { { scopes: [:invalid_scope] } }
it_behaves_like 'token creation fails'
it 'returns the scope error message' do
response = subject
expect(response.error?).to be true
expect(response.errors).to include("Scopes can only contain available scopes")
end
it_behaves_like 'correct error message'
end
end
@ -217,6 +219,7 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceAccessTokens::CreateService do
let_it_be(:bot_user) { create(:user, :project_bot) }
let(:unpersisted_member) { build(:project_member, source: resource, user: bot_user) }
let(:error_message) { 'Could not provision maintainer access to project access token' }
before do
allow_next_instance_of(ResourceAccessTokens::CreateService) do |service|
@ -226,13 +229,7 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceAccessTokens::CreateService do
end
it_behaves_like 'token creation fails'
it 'returns the provisioning error message' do
response = subject
expect(response.error?).to be true
expect(response.errors).to include("Could not provision maintainer access to project access token")
end
it_behaves_like 'correct error message'
end
end
@ -246,14 +243,10 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceAccessTokens::CreateService do
end
shared_examples 'when user does not have permission to create a resource bot' do
let(:error_message) { "User does not have permission to create #{resource_type} access token" }
it_behaves_like 'token creation fails'
it 'returns the permission error message' do
response = subject
expect(response.error?).to be true
expect(response.errors).to include("User does not have permission to create #{resource_type} access token")
end
it_behaves_like 'correct error message'
end
context 'when resource is a project' do
@ -273,11 +266,19 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceAccessTokens::CreateService do
let_it_be(:params) { { access_level: Gitlab::Access::OWNER } }
context 'when the executor is a MAINTAINER' do
it 'does not add the bot user with the specified access level in the resource' do
response = subject
let(:error_message) { 'Could not provision owner access to project access token' }
expect(response.error?).to be true
expect(response.errors).to include('Could not provision owner access to project access token')
context 'with OWNER access_level, in integer format' do
it_behaves_like 'token creation fails'
it_behaves_like 'correct error message'
end
context 'with OWNER access_level, in string format' do
let(:error_message) { 'Could not provision owner access to project access token' }
let_it_be(:params) { { access_level: Gitlab::Access::OWNER.to_s } }
it_behaves_like 'token creation fails'
it_behaves_like 'correct error message'
end
end