Fix missing access checks on issue lookup using IssuableFinder
Split from !2024 to partially solve https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23867⚠️ - Potentially untested
💣 - No test coverage
🚥 - Test coverage of some sort exists (a test failed when error raised)
🚦 - Test coverage of return value (a test failed when nil used)
✅ - Permissions check tested
- [x] ✅ app/controllers/projects/branches_controller.rb:39
- `before_action :authorize_push_code!` helpes limit/prevent exploitation. Always checks for reporter access so fine with
confidential issues, issues only visible to team, etc.
- [x] 🚥 app/models/cycle_analytics/summary.rb:9 [`.count`]
- [x] ✅ app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb:19
- [x] Potential double render in app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb
- https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2024/diffs#cedccb227af9bfdf88802767cb58d43c2b977439_24_24
See merge request !2030
This moves methods from `LfsHelper` to a new `LfsRequest` concern and
introduces a new `WorkhorseRequest` concern.
Closes#22253
See merge request !7623
Flushing the events cache worked by updating a recent number of rows in
the "events" table. This has the result that on PostgreSQL a lot of dead
tuples are produced on a regular basis. This in turn means that
PostgreSQL will spend considerable amounts of time vacuuming this table.
This in turn can lead to an increase of database load.
For GitLab.com we measured the impact of not using events caching and
found no measurable increase in response timings. Meanwhile not flushing
the events cache lead to the "events" table having no more dead tuples
as now rows are only inserted into this table.
As a result of this we are hereby removing events caching as it does not
appear to help and only increases database load.
For more information see the following comment:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6578#note_18864037
Cycle analytics second iteration frontend
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Mostly typos and code guidelines.
## Why was this MR needed?
This implements the frontend part of !6859 for #23449
## Screenshots
**Initial view**
**Cycle Analytics with data**
**User doesn't have access for a stage**
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#23449
See merge request !7366
Douwe Maan
Adam Niedzielski
Robert Speicher
Douwe Maan
Rémy Coutable
Yorick Peterse
Valery Sizov
Kamil Trzciński
Jacob Schatz
Sean McGivern
Alfredo Sumaran
James Lopez
Ruben Davila
Z.J. van de Weg
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre