* upstream/master: (123 commits)
Limit the size of SVGs when viewing them as blobs
Add a spec for ProjectsFinder project_ids_relation option
Fix ProjectsFinder spec
Pass project IDs relation to ProjectsFinder instead of using a block
Speed up todos queries by limiting the projects set we join with
Used phantomjs variable
Ability to specify branches for pivotal tracker integration
Fix a memory leak caused by Banzai::Filter::SanitizationFilter
Update phantomjs link
Remove sleeping and replace escaped text.
Filters test fix
Fixed filtering tests
Removed screenshot command 💩
Updated failing tests
Used mirrored version on GitLab
Updated tests
Fix `U2fSpec` for PhantomJS versions > 2.
Fix file downloading
Install latest stable phantomjs
Use new PhantomJS version
...
Show deployment status on a MR view
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Resolves#19571, one in the list of #19992
## Screenshots (if relevant)
external_url = nil
external_url != nil
Note, the timings are weird between merging and deploying, that is because I did it in the wrong order.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
See merge request !5622
An MR can only be resolved in the UI if:
- It has conflicts.
- It has valid diff_refs (in other words, it supports new diff notes).
- It has no conflicts with one side missing.
- It has no conflicts in binary files.
- It has no conflicts in files too large to display.
- It has no conflicts containing invalid conflict markers.
DRY code + fix rubocop
Add more test cases
Append to changelog
DRY changes list
find_url service for merge_requests
use GET for getting merge request links
remove files
rename to get_url_service
reduce loop
add test case for cross project
refactor tiny thing
update changelog
- Preloading noteable we share the same noteable instance when more than one
discussion refers to the same noteable.
- Any other call to that object that is cached in that object will be for any
discussion.
- In those cases where merge_request_diff has all the sha stored to build a diff_refs get that
diff_refs using directly those sha instead accessing to the git repository to first get the
commits and later the sha.
* Add merge_request_diff validation to merge_request model
* Improve initialize of merge_request_diff object
* Rename some merge_request_diff methods for clarity
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
When importing a pull request from GitHub, the old and new branches may
no longer actually exist by those names, but we need to recreate the
merge request diff with the right source and target shas.
We use these `target_branch_sha` and `source_branch_sha` attributes to
force these to the intended values. But the reader methods were always
looking up to the target/source branch head instead of check if these
values was previously set.
1. Don't use case statements for dispatch anymore. This leads to a lot
of duplication, and makes the logic harder to follow.
2. Remove duplicated logic.
- For example, the `can_push_to_branch?` exists, but we also have a
different way of checking the same condition within `change_access_check`.
- This kind of duplication is removed, and the `can_push_to_branch?`
method is used in both places.
3. Move checks returning true/false to `UserAccess`.
- All public methods in `GitAccess` now return an instance of
`GitAccessStatus`. Previously, some methods would return
true/false as well, which was confusing.
- It makes sense for these kinds of checks to be at the level of a
user, so the `UserAccess` class was repurposed for this. The prior
`UserAccess.allowed?` classmethod is converted into an instance
method.
- All external uses of these checks have been migrated to use the
`UserAccess` class
4. Move the "change_access_check" into a separate class.
- Create the `GitAccess::ChangeAccessCheck` class to run these
checks, which are quite substantial.
- `ChangeAccessCheck` returns an instance of `GitAccessStatus` as
well.
5. Break out the boolean logic in `ChangeAccessCheck` into `if/else`
chains - this seems more readable.
6. I can understand that this might look like overkill for !4892, but I
think this is a good opportunity to clean it up.
- http://martinfowler.com/bliki/OpportunisticRefactoring.html
The issue was that `MergeRequest#mergeable?` returns false when the CI
state is not success and project.only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds is
true. In this case `Projects::MergeRequestsController#merge` would
return the `:failed` status when enabling `merge_when_build_succeeds`,
thus leading to a weird state and the MR never automatically merged.
The fix is to disable the CI state check in the controller safeguard
that early return the `:failed` status.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
When using #XYZ in Markdown text, if XYZ exceeds the maximum value of a signed 32-bit integer, we
get an exception when the Markdown render attempts to run `where(iids: XYZ)`. Introduce a method
that will throw out out-of-bounds values.
Closes#18777
Enable the Rubocop DeprecatedClassMethods cop
This reports uses of `File.exists?` and `Dir.exists?`, which were both
deprecated in Ruby and will eventually be removed in favor of `.exist?`.
Also fixes all existing uses of the deprecated methods.
See merge request !4087
In 8278b763d9 the default behaviour of annotation
has changes, which was causing a lot of noise in diffs. We decided in #17382
that it is better to get rid of the whole annotate gem, and instead let people
look at schema.rb for the columns in a table.
Fixes: #17382
This reports uses of `File.exists?` and `Dir.exists?`, which were both
deprecated in Ruby and will eventually be removed in favor of
`.exist?`. Also fixes all existing uses of the deprecated methods.
Ci::Commit becomes a Pipeline object
1. Ci::Commit receives context: ref, :tag.
1. One Ci::Commit describes a one Pipeline
1. Pipeline is created from `.gitlab-ci.yml`
1. Pipeline is a ordered group of builds
1. We test MR against Pipeline
1. Pipelines have a separate view (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/3703)
1. Pipeline can be triggered from UI (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/3703)
1. Later we change `Trigger -> TriggerRequest -> Build` to `Trigger -> Pipeline` (future)
1. We add a Pipeline Hook that will be triggered on Pipeline status change (future)
1. We extend notifications to use `Pipeline Hook` to send summary on pipeline changes (future)
After merging that I'll prepare a separate MR that will unify naming, database columns, table names:
```
Ci::Commit -> Pipeline
Ci::Build -> Build
CommitStatus -> Job
GenericCommitStatus -> ExternalJob
ci_commits -> pipelines
ci_builds -> jobs
```
This MR implements first 5 points.
This is made to solve this issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14149.
See merge request !3653
Remove fork link closes all merge requests opened on source project
Currently, if you:
- create a fork
- open a merge request on the source project
- remove the fork link
The created MR cannot be closed.
With this MR, all pending MR is closed when the fork link is removed.
See merge request !3189
`MergeRequest#source_sha` is expected to return the sha of the source
branch last commit.
But when a open Merge Request has no diff (e.g. all commits have already
been merged to the target branch), `merge_request.source_sha`
incorrectly returns `nil`.
This was un-noticed before – but now that !2217 has been merged,
it makes `Gitlab::Git::Commit.between` raise an
"Unexpected nil argument" exception.
This fixes the crash, by making sure that `source_sha` returns a
correct result even when there is no diff available.
The OR condition for source_project_id/target_project_id leads to a
query plan that performs rather poorly on PostgreSQL due to the use of
sub-queries. Because Rails offers no easy alternative for this
particular problem we're forced to using a UNION for both conditions.
The resulting query performs much faster than just using an OR.
Indicate when an MR diverged from the target branch
This adds an indicator to the "Merge MR" box, to tell if and how much an MR diverged from its target branch.
For instance, consider an MR to merge the branch `feature` into `master`. Some other commits were added to `master` since `feature` was created, and the two branches diverged.
```text
o master
|
o o feature
| |
o o
| /
o
```
In this case, there will be a label in the MR Merge box stating:
> This MR is by 3 commits behind the target branch `master`.
## Screenshots
### The branch diverged from the target (UI Proposal)
### The branch diverged from the target (alternative UI Proposal)
## How is this useful?
- In a _rebase-workflow_ (MR are preferably rebased before being merged), the reviewer wants to know if an MR is rebased on the target branch before merging it.
_With this indicator, the reviewer knows immediately if the branch is rebased, or if she needs to ask the committer to rebase its branch._
<br>
- To keep the git history readable, a team prefers to avoid merging branches that really lag a lot behind the target branch. Merging an MR that is 10 commits behind is fine, but 200 is too much.
_With this indicator, the reviewer can see on the MR page if the branch is really far behind the target – or only a few commits behind._
## Open questions
We've been using this at @captaintrain for a few months now, and found it quite useful.
I guess the open-questions are mostly: what UI would be the more adequate? Any thoughts on this, on the general usefulness and/or on the code?
See merge request !2217
In case merge request is broken, we shouldn't check if the sha
is mergable, as it will be null, and there's no point, as we know
that it's not mergable.
Hide remove source branch button when new commit is added to branch
Fixes#3339
This MR hides the 'Remove source branch' button when a new commit is added to the source branch
/cc @DouweM
See merge request !2701
No space required after WIP identifier
Fixes#2426
Currently, the WIP: (or any other variation) prefix of a merge request title must include a trailing space for it to be recognized as a work in progress and prevent merging.
To resolve this, I added an or pattern to the regexp to look for any one of the three possible delimiters ':', ']', or ' '. This way the trailing space isn't required but it still won't mark any titles beginning with wip as work in progress (e.g. "Wipwap").
See merge request !1876
Instead of running ClosingIssueExtractor for every commit in a merge
request we can gather all the commit messages (and the merge request
description), concatenate all this together and then run
ClosingIssueExtractor only once.
The result of this is that MergeRequest#closes_issues is now between
3.5x and 4x faster than the old setup. Using a merge request with 10
commits (each referencing a number of issues to close) this reduced the
call duration from around 200 milliseconds to around 50 milliseconds.
As a result of these changes the Jira related tests for
MergeRequest#closes_issues have been removed. These tests stubbed
Commit#closes_issues meaning that the only code that was really tested
was the call to Array#uniq to filter out duplicate issues. As this code
is no longer used (nor present) the corresponding tests were removed.
Related: gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#12419
Improve performance of getting issues on group level
For testing I used the URL http://localhost:3000/groups/gitlab-org/issues?milestone_title=8.1. Prior to these changes said URL would take about 10-12 seconds to load. By applying these changes the loading time has been reduced to roughly 2-3 seconds.
There's still some stuff going on in some views that I have to look at, resolving those changes might reduce the loading time a bit more. I also still have to check if I didn't break too many tests.
Fixes: gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#3707 gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#4071
See merge request !2318
Douwe Maan
Connor Shea
Kamil Trzcinski
Lin Jen-Shin
Douwe Maan
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Sean McGivern
Z.J. van de Weg
Scott Le
Paco Guzman
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre
Rémy Coutable
Robert Speicher
Timothy Andrew
Mathias Vestergaard
Patricio Cano
James Lopez
Stan Hu
Rui Anderson
Jacob Vosmaer (GitLab)
Jeroen Jacobs
Robert Speicher
Jeroen van Baarsen
Felipe Artur
Yorick Peterse
Gabriel Mazetto
Abhi Rao
Pierre de La Morinerie
Baldinof
Rubén Dávila
Jacob Schatz
Jacob Vosmaer
Pierre de La Morinerie
Rubén Dávila
Nemanja Boric
Zeger-Jan van de Weg