MINOR: Improve consistency of acknowledge type terminology (#20282)

The code had a mixture of "acknowledgement type" and "acknowledge type".
The latter is preferred.

Reviewers: TengYao Chi <frankvicky@apache.org>, Lan Ding
 <isDing_L@163.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Schofield 2025-08-01 21:17:22 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent e1f45218c9
commit b909544e99
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
10 changed files with 27 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ public class ShareConsumerTest {
return partitionOffsetsMap.containsKey(tp);
}, DEFAULT_MAX_WAIT_MS, 100L, () -> "Failed to receive call to callback");
// We expect no exception as the acknowledgment error code is null.
// We expect no exception as the acknowledgement error code is null.
assertFalse(partitionExceptionMap.containsKey(tp));
verifyShareGroupStateTopicRecordsProduced();
}
@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ public class ShareConsumerTest {
shareConsumer.poll(Duration.ofMillis(1000));
shareConsumer.close();
// We expect no exception as the acknowledgment error code is null.
// We expect no exception as the acknowledgement error code is null.
assertFalse(partitionExceptionMap.containsKey(tp));
verifyShareGroupStateTopicRecordsProduced();
}
@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ public class ShareConsumerTest {
shareConsumer.setAcknowledgementCommitCallback(new TestableAcknowledgementCommitCallbackWithShareConsumer<>(shareConsumer));
shareConsumer.subscribe(Set.of(tp.topic()));
// The acknowledgment commit callback will try to call a method of ShareConsumer
// The acknowledgement commit callback will try to call a method of ShareConsumer
shareConsumer.poll(Duration.ofMillis(5000));
// The second poll sends the acknowledgements implicitly.
// The acknowledgement commit callback will be called and the exception is thrown.
@ -1540,14 +1540,14 @@ public class ShareConsumerTest {
producer.send(record);
producer.flush();
// The acknowledgment commit callback will try to call a method of ShareConsumer
// The acknowledgement commit callback will try to call a method of ShareConsumer
shareConsumer.setAcknowledgementCommitCallback(new TestableAcknowledgementCommitCallbackWakeup<>(shareConsumer));
shareConsumer.subscribe(Set.of(tp.topic()));
TestUtils.waitForCondition(() -> shareConsumer.poll(Duration.ofMillis(2000)).count() == 1,
DEFAULT_MAX_WAIT_MS, 100L, () -> "Failed to consume records for share consumer");
// The second poll sends the acknowledgments implicitly.
// The second poll sends the acknowledgements implicitly.
shareConsumer.poll(Duration.ofMillis(2000));
// Till now acknowledgement commit callback has not been called, so no exception thrown yet.

View File

@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ import static org.apache.kafka.common.utils.Utils.propsToMap;
* </pre>
*
* <h4>Per-record acknowledgement (explicit acknowledgement)</h4>
* This example demonstrates using different acknowledgement types depending on the outcome of processing the records.
* This example demonstrates using different acknowledge types depending on the outcome of processing the records.
* Here the {@code share.acknowledgement.mode} property is set to "explicit" so the consumer must explicitly acknowledge each record.
* <pre>
* Properties props = new Properties();

View File

@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ public class Acknowledgements {
currentBatch.acknowledgeTypes().add(ACKNOWLEDGE_TYPE_GAP);
}
}
List<AcknowledgementBatch> optimalBatches = maybeOptimiseAcknowledgementTypes(currentBatch);
List<AcknowledgementBatch> optimalBatches = maybeOptimiseAcknowledgeTypes(currentBatch);
optimalBatches.forEach(batch -> {
if (canOptimiseForSingleAcknowledgeType(batch)) {
@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ public class Acknowledgements {
*/
private AcknowledgementBatch maybeCreateNewBatch(AcknowledgementBatch currentBatch, Long nextOffset, List<AcknowledgementBatch> batches) {
if (nextOffset != currentBatch.lastOffset() + 1) {
List<AcknowledgementBatch> optimalBatches = maybeOptimiseAcknowledgementTypes(currentBatch);
List<AcknowledgementBatch> optimalBatches = maybeOptimiseAcknowledgeTypes(currentBatch);
optimalBatches.forEach(batch -> {
if (canOptimiseForSingleAcknowledgeType(batch)) {
@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ public class Acknowledgements {
* whose count exceeds the default value. In this case, the batch is split into 2 such that the
* batch with the continuous records has only 1 acknowledge type in its array.
*/
private List<AcknowledgementBatch> maybeOptimiseAcknowledgementTypes(AcknowledgementBatch currentAcknowledgeBatch) {
private List<AcknowledgementBatch> maybeOptimiseAcknowledgeTypes(AcknowledgementBatch currentAcknowledgeBatch) {
List<AcknowledgementBatch> batches = new ArrayList<>();
if (currentAcknowledgeBatch == null) return batches;

View File

@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ public class ShareCompletedFetch {
* @param maxRecords The number of records to return; the number returned may be {@code 0 <= maxRecords}
* @param checkCrcs Whether to check the CRC of fetched records
*
* @return {@link ShareInFlightBatch The ShareInFlightBatch containing records and their acknowledgments}
* @return {@link ShareInFlightBatch The ShareInFlightBatch containing records and their acknowledgements}
*/
<K, V> ShareInFlightBatch<K, V> fetchRecords(final Deserializers<K, V> deserializers,
final int maxRecords,

View File

@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ public class ShareFetch<K, V> {
* Acknowledge a single record in the current batch.
*
* @param record The record to acknowledge
* @param type The acknowledgment type which indicates whether it was processed successfully
* @param type The acknowledge type which indicates whether it was processed successfully
*/
public void acknowledge(final ConsumerRecord<K, V> record, final AcknowledgeType type) {
for (Map.Entry<TopicIdPartition, ShareInFlightBatch<K, V>> tipBatch : batches.entrySet()) {
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ public class ShareFetch<K, V> {
* @param topic The topic of the record to acknowledge
* @param partition The partition of the record
* @param offset The offset of the record
* @param type The acknowledgment type which indicates whether it was processed successfully
* @param type The acknowledge type which indicates whether it was processed successfully
*/
public void acknowledge(final String topic, final int partition, final long offset, final AcknowledgeType type) {
for (Map.Entry<TopicIdPartition, ShareInFlightBatch<K, V>> tipBatch : batches.entrySet()) {

View File

@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ public class AcknowledgementsTest {
}
@Test
public void testSingleAcknowledgementTypeExceedingLimit() {
public void testSingleAcknowledgeTypeExceedingLimit() {
int i = 0;
for (; i < maxRecordsWithSameAcknowledgeType; i++) {
acks.add(i, AcknowledgeType.ACCEPT);
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ public class AcknowledgementsTest {
}
@Test
public void testSingleAcknowledgementTypeWithGap() {
public void testSingleAcknowledgeTypeWithGap() {
for (int i = 0; i < maxRecordsWithSameAcknowledgeType; i++) {
acks.add(i, null);
}
@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ public class AcknowledgementsTest {
}
@Test
public void testSingleAcknowledgementTypeWithinLimit() {
public void testSingleAcknowledgeTypeWithinLimit() {
acks.add(0L, AcknowledgeType.ACCEPT);
acks.add(1L, AcknowledgeType.ACCEPT);
acks.add(2L, AcknowledgeType.ACCEPT);

View File

@ -4462,7 +4462,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
assertEquals(20, sharePartition.startOffset());
assertEquals(36, sharePartition.endOffset());
// For cached state corresponding to entry 2, the batch state will be ACKNOWLEDGED, hence it will be cleared as part of acknowledgment.
// For cached state corresponding to entry 2, the batch state will be ACKNOWLEDGED, hence it will be cleared as part of acknowledgement.
assertEquals(6, sharePartition.cachedState().size());
assertEquals(MEMBER_ID, sharePartition.cachedState().get(7L).batchMemberId());
@ -4768,7 +4768,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
}
@Test
public void testLsoMovementAheadOfEndOffsetPostAcknowledgment() {
public void testLsoMovementAheadOfEndOffsetPostAcknowledgement() {
SharePartition sharePartition = SharePartitionBuilder.builder().withState(SharePartitionState.ACTIVE).build();
fetchAcquiredRecords(sharePartition, memoryRecords(5, 2), 5);
@ -4884,7 +4884,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
}
@Test
public void testLsoMovementPostGapsInAcknowledgments() {
public void testLsoMovementPostGapsInAcknowledgements() {
SharePartition sharePartition = SharePartitionBuilder.builder().withState(SharePartitionState.ACTIVE).build();
MemoryRecords records1 = memoryRecords(2, 5);
@ -5733,7 +5733,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
}
@Test
public void testMaybeUpdateCachedStateWhenAcknowledgementTypeAccept() {
public void testMaybeUpdateCachedStateWhenAcknowledgeTypeAccept() {
SharePartition sharePartition = SharePartitionBuilder.builder().withState(SharePartitionState.ACTIVE).build();
fetchAcquiredRecords(sharePartition, memoryRecords(250, 0), 250);
@ -5753,7 +5753,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
}
@Test
public void testMaybeUpdateCachedStateWhenAcknowledgementTypeReject() {
public void testMaybeUpdateCachedStateWhenAcknowledgeTypeReject() {
SharePartition sharePartition = SharePartitionBuilder.builder().withState(SharePartitionState.ACTIVE).build();
fetchAcquiredRecords(sharePartition, memoryRecords(250, 0), 250);
@ -5773,7 +5773,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
}
@Test
public void testMaybeUpdateCachedStateWhenAcknowledgementTypeRelease() {
public void testMaybeUpdateCachedStateWhenAcknowledgeTypeRelease() {
SharePartition sharePartition = SharePartitionBuilder.builder().withState(SharePartitionState.ACTIVE).build();
fetchAcquiredRecords(sharePartition, memoryRecords(250, 0), 250);
@ -5937,7 +5937,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
fetchAcquiredRecords(sharePartition, memoryRecords(100, 80), 100);
assertFalse(sharePartition.canAcquireRecords());
// Final Acknowledgment, all records are acknowledged here.
// Final Acknowledgement, all records are acknowledged here.
sharePartition.acknowledge(MEMBER_ID, List.of(
new ShareAcknowledgementBatch(50, 179, List.of((byte) 3))));
@ -5984,7 +5984,7 @@ public class SharePartitionTest {
fetchAcquiredRecords(sharePartition, memoryRecords(10, 11), 10);
assertTrue(sharePartition.canAcquireRecords());
// Sending acknowledgment for the first batch from 11 to 20
// Sending acknowledgement for the first batch from 11 to 20
sharePartition.acknowledge(MEMBER_ID, List.of(
new ShareAcknowledgementBatch(11, 20, List.of((byte) 1))));

View File

@ -7979,12 +7979,12 @@ class KafkaApisTest extends Logging {
private def compareAcknowledgementBatches(baseOffset: Long,
endOffset: Long,
acknowledgementType: Byte,
acknowledgeType: Byte,
acknowledgementBatch: ShareAcknowledgementBatch
): Boolean = {
if (baseOffset == acknowledgementBatch.firstOffset()
&& endOffset == acknowledgementBatch.lastOffset()
&& acknowledgementType == acknowledgementBatch.acknowledgeTypes().get(0)) {
&& acknowledgeType == acknowledgementBatch.acknowledgeTypes().get(0)) {
return true
}
false

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import java.util.List;
/**
* The ShareAcknowledgementBatch containing the fields required to acknowledge the fetched records.
* The class abstracts the acknowledgment request for <code>SharePartition</code> class constructed
* The class abstracts the acknowledgement request for <code>SharePartition</code> class constructed
* from {@link org.apache.kafka.common.message.ShareFetchRequestData.AcknowledgementBatch} and
* {@link org.apache.kafka.common.message.ShareAcknowledgeRequestData.AcknowledgementBatch} classes.
*/

View File

@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ public class InFlightBatch {
// The offset state map is used to track the state of the records per offset. However, the
// offset state map is only required when the state of the offsets within same batch are
// different. The states can be different when explicit offset acknowledgment is done which
// different. The states can be different when explicit offset acknowledgement is done which
// is different from the batch state.
private NavigableMap<Long, InFlightState> offsetState;