- Both `/api/generate` and `/api/chat` now accept a `"think"`
option that allows specifying whether thinking mode should be on or
not
- Templates get passed this new option so, e.g., qwen3's template can
put `/think` or `/no_think` in the system prompt depending on the
value of the setting
- Models' thinking support is inferred by inspecting model templates.
The prefix and suffix the parser uses to identify thinking support is
also automatically inferred from templates
- Thinking control & parsing is opt-in via the API to prevent breaking
existing API consumers. If the `"think"` option is not specified, the
behavior is unchanged from previous versions of ollama
- Add parsing for thinking blocks in both streaming/non-streaming mode
in both `/generate` and `/chat`
- Update the CLI to make use of these changes. Users can pass `--think`
or `--think=false` to control thinking, or during an interactive
session they can use the commands `/set think` or `/set nothink`
- A `--hidethinking` option has also been added to the CLI. This makes
it easy to use thinking in scripting scenarios like
`ollama run qwen3 --think --hidethinking "my question here"` where you
just want to see the answer but still want the benefits of thinking
models
FromFloatSlice and FromIntSlice return an error if the shape doesn't
match the passed data or if memory can't be allocated. Since these
are inputs, the memory being allocated is system memory rather than VRAM.
In many cases, the caller can't really handle the error and panics.
Empty and Zeros directly panic if they can't allocate memory.
This makes things consistent by panicing for the first two cases,
removing a fair amount of error handling code. This is also consistent
with how Go typically handles these situations.
* fix mllama convert
- transform attn_gate and ffn_gate
- swap attention heads for vision models
* fix mllama
the mlp gate which was applied in the wrong place
setting samebatch on the vision start token is problematic because it
will be shared with other inputs that also use images. this will cause
the input to be cached and the runner will not see SameBatch. SameBatch
will also be incorrect since it may be for a different image.
assigning samebatch to the input tokens resolves this by ensure it's
assigned correctly to inputs corresponding to the image.
not setting same batch correctly may cause panics during inference since
images are no longer guaranteed to be in the same batch.
Currently, when the backend is created, the tensors are loaded at the
same time, which is a slow operation. This separates them to be two
steps:
- Create backend, including enumerating tensors and memory allocation
- Loading tensor data
This allows more flexibility in managing model loading.
* get eos_token_id from generation_config.json
* refactor
* include both ids and strings in trace
* comments
* remove special case for gemma3 special vocab (#10743)
For some multimodal models (such as gemma3), we create a single
graph that generates the image embedding and then use this in the
text model. The embedding tensor is completely opaque to the runner.
However, this doesn't work if we need to use the embedding in multiple
batches. This can arise if the embedding is larger than the batch size.
In these cases (as with llama4), we would like to create views that
are more appropriately sized. However, if we do this then the original
source tensor is used in multiple graphs, which isn't allowed. To
avoid that problem, models with this pattern compute the embedding
tensor on first use and recreate the individual views. There is no
longer a single vision and text graph.
This codifies the pattern of separating vision and text graphs. The
logic of computing tensors on demand is moved to the runner, so models
no longer have to worry about this. It also gives the runner visibility
into the multimodal tensors, which is important for memory management.
Currently, the KV cache and graph are lazily allocated as needed.
The cache is fully allocated on first use of the corresponding
layer whereas the graph grows with the size of the context.
This can be an issue if another application allocates more VRAM
after we do our calculations - Ollama will crash in the middle of
inference. If we instead allocate the maximum needed memory at
startup of the runner, we will either succeed or fail at that point
rather than at some surprising time in the future.
Currently, this only generates a worst case batch for text, which
means that vision models may get a partial allocation and continue
to lazily allocate the rest.
Mistral is a popular research lab making open source models. This updates
the forward pass of llama architecture models to support both llama models
and mistral models by accounting for additional metadata present in mistral
models, and finding the correct dimensions for the output projection.
Rather than directly giving the input data to models, we can
pass a tensor instead. In the short term, this saves some duplicated
code.
Longer term, we will want to overlap setting up the next batch with
processing of the current one. In this case, we will only have the
shape of tensor but it will not be loaded with data at the time of
graph generation. By passing only a tensor to models now, we set up
this possibility and prevent them from relying on data that they won't
have in the future.
Although the same could be done for Positions and Outputs, in some
cases we either need the raw input data or don't use them at all.
Therefore, for now we leave them as they are and allow models to
convert them to tensors as needed.
Currently there is a single context per sequence, shared all by
all multimodal inputs. Since we build a vision encoder graph per
image, with a large number of inputs we can eventually hit the
maximum number of graph nodes per context.
This changes to use a separate context for each image, ensuring
that available resource limits are consistent.
Models may require that a set of inputs all be processed as part
of the same batch. For example, if an image has multiple patches
with fully connected attention between them, we should not split
the batch in the middle of an image.
Fixes#9697
Softcap isn't in the whitepaper/implementation for the language model so we should remove it. There is no discernible difference in output with it removed.
This is useful for a few things:
- Work around bugs, such as having 2 images in one batch
- Keep the image in a single batch for fully connected attention
- Improve performance by not evaluating embeddings multiple times
The encoder cache needs to know the position of images in the input
stream so that it knows when to delete them. Previously images didn't
have a position, so we implied one by breaking batches before an
image and then assuming the image was in the first position. However,
multimodal objects are now given explicit positions in the input
stream, so we can use that instead.
Breaking batches was also a way to simulate a cross attention mask
for mllama. However, given that it only supports a single sequence
and a single image, this mask doesn't serve any real purpose.
Removing the batch break does not appear to affect the quality of
the output.
Most of this is simply moving the input data structures to a new
package to avoid import cycles.
use a similar strategy as llama.cpp for deciding where tensors should be
allocated. this will be improved later to be aware of usable memory
before assigning the tensor
Various vision models have different requirements for how they
receive their inputs. For example:
- Mllama wants images together with text and the image embeddings
don't themselves have positions or get stored in the main KV cache
- Llava-style models feed in embeddings similar to tokens and
images correspond to a varying number of tokens in the cache.
In addition, the strategy for providing inputs must support batching
and multiple sequences, which are managed by the runner. At the same
time, we want to keep data handling fully in the model so that new
architectures are not bottlenecked by runner code which does not
understand their particular requirements.
This provides a method for models to edit the input stream so that
it meets their needs while still being in a format that the runner
understands. This allows the runner to avoid special processing
for different models.
In addition, this fixes a regression where non-vision models may
try to incorrectly interpret images.
We sometimes tokenize partial strings. For example, with
multimodal inputs, we split the input string around the images
and then tokenize each piece. In these cases, we should only add
the special tokens on the first piece.
* Include unified vision layers in memory prediction
For newer vision models with a single gguf, include
the projection estimates.
* Adjust CLI to handle both styles of vision model metadata
* Wire up new tokenizers for new engine
If we're loading the new engine, utilize the new model
text processor instead of calling into cgo wrappers for
llama.cpp. This also cleans up some tech debt from the
older tokenization flow for the C++ server which was
no longer used.
This also adjusts the grammar handling logic to pass
through to the new engine instead of utilizing the cgo
schema to grammar call.
* Lay foundation for auto selection of new engine
Prior to performing attention, we need to permute query, key
and value. Currently we call Contiguous after each of these
permutations, which is correct but expensive. Avoiding the
3 calls to Contiguous increases performance by over 20%.
The permutations of query and key do not violate the continuity
rules for mulmat and the Contiguous call can be simply removed.
Value requires a different permutation and does require Contiguous.
However, we can use the copy into the cache as a way to perform this
without further overhead.
To support this and avoid unexpected tensor shapes that are seen by
models, we need tighter integration between attention, cache
and backend. Future optimization will also likely need this structure
- for example, flash attention has special padding requirements in
the cache and other backends may have their own needs.
This further contains the operations that go into attention so that
these and other optimizations can be handled transparently. Models
that have special requirements for attention can still implement
their own version of it.
update Context.Forward to accept multiple tensors to match
Context.Compute signature
update Context.Forward to return Context such that it can be chained
with Context.Compute
There are two benefits to doing this:
- Provide a library function that models can use, reducing code for
each model implementation
- Enables a single place to drop in optimized implementations of
attention based on the backend or other factors. One is provided for
GGML.
On CUDA this improves token generation rate by about 3%. It does not
have a significant effect on Metal.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Hiltgen <daniel@ollama.com>
Currently Rows is called as the last step in a model computation
to get the values for the output tokens. However, if we move it
earlier in the process then we can trim out computations that
never get used. This is similar to how models are defined in
llama.cpp.
Changing the model definition in this way improves token generation
performance by approximately 8%.
Currently the following parameters are in the runner but not used:
- numGPULayers
- mainGPU
- threads
- tensorSplit
This passes them through to the backend, which is where they would
actually get used. However, the GGML backend does not yet do anything
with them.
This provides integration with the new Ollama engine
(5824541 next ollama runner (#7913)) and the rest of the Ollama
infrastructure such as the runner and Ollama server.
In addition, it also builds out the KV cache infrastructure to
support requirements of how Ollama runs models such as:
- Parallel processing
- Memory management for defragmentation and shifting
- Multi-modal modals
Both old and new engines continue to be supported. By default, only
the old engine is used. To enable the new engine:
Start the server with the OLLAMA_NEW_ENGINE environment variable set:
OLLAMA_NEW_ENGINE=1 ./ollama serve
Start a model that is supported by the Ollama engine. This one is Llama 3.1 8b Q4_K_M:
./ollama run jessegross/llama3.1
Special tokens are currently read as uint32 from the model metadata.
However, all other parts of the system (including the tokenizer) use
int32 to represent tokens so it is impossible to represent the high
portion of the unsigned range. For consistency and to avoid casts,
we should just use int32 everywhere.
Currently, if a model uses an interface for its data structures (as mllama
does) then the tensor data in the structs implementing that interface will
not get loaded.
Most tensor backends try to optimize performance by using a lower
precision for matmuls. However, some operations (such as kq) on
some models are sensitive to this and require full precision.
There are two cases where we may not have an output after computing:
- Prompt processing where the length of the input exceeds the batch
size
- Internal memory management operations such as cache defrag and shift
Currently there is a mixture of int and int64 used when dealing with
tensor dimensions and shapes, which causes unnecessary conversions -
they all should be the same type.
In general, most interfaces (such as Pytorch) use int64 for
generality but most implementations (such as CUDA) use int32 for
performance. There isn't much benefit to us to being more flexible
than the implementations we are likely to run on.
In addition, as a practical matter, a model with a tensor with a single
dimension larger than 32 bits is unlikely to run on a 32-bit machine.
feat: add new Ollama engine using ggml through cgo
This change introduces a new way to run pretrained models. It introduces 3 high level interfaces and a bunch of smaller helper interfaces to facilitate this.
- `model.Model` defines the interface for a model architecture. Models such as `llama` and `mllama`, which are provided as examples, can implement the model's forward propagation in the `Forward` method. This method will be called to generate completions. This interface can be found in `model/model.go`
- `ml.Backend` defines the interface for a backend tensor library, in this case `ggml`. Among other things, a Backend is responsible for loading a pretrained model into hardware (GPU, CPU, etc) and providing an interface for Models to access loaded tensors. This interface can be found in `ml/backend.go`
- `ml.Tensor` defines the interface for a tensor and tensor operations
This is the first implementation of the new engine. Follow up PRs will implement more features:
- non-greedy sampling (#8410)
- integration with Ollama and KV caching (#8301)
- more model support (#9080) with more coming soon
Co-authored-by: Bruce MacDonald <brucewmacdonald@gmail.com>
Michael Yang
Jeffrey Morgan
Devon Rifkin
Jesse Gross
Bruce MacDonald
Michael Yang
Parth Sareen
Patrick Devine
Daniel Hiltgen