From 3b107b86ca7d1c6309bc7071ead59acb8c098f3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Mraz Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:20:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Windows: use srand() instead of srandom() This is used for memory allocation failure debugging only Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove Reviewed-by: Paul Dale (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22347) --- crypto/mem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/crypto/mem.c b/crypto/mem.c index d7aa3ab85d..eef1165708 100644 --- a/crypto/mem.c +++ b/crypto/mem.c @@ -122,12 +122,13 @@ static void parseit(void) } /* - * Windows doesn't have random(), but it has rand() + * Windows doesn't have random() and srandom(), but it has rand() and srand(). * Some rand() implementations aren't good, but we're not * dealing with secure randomness here. */ # ifdef _WIN32 # define random() rand() +# define srandom(seed) srand(seed) # endif /* * See if the current malloc should fail.