That caused several memory leaks in case of error.
Also when the CMS object that is created by CMS_EncryptedData_encrypt
is not used in the normal way, but instead just deleted
by CMS_ContentInfo_free some memory was lost.
Fixes#21985
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22008)
That seems to be only an issue for RSA-PSS with parameters.
Spotted by code review, so it looks like there is no test coverage for this.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22007)
This must fail with DH_CHECK_INVALID_Q_VALUE and
with DH_CHECK_Q_NOT_PRIME unset.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21551)
Confirm that the only errors DH_check() finds with DH parameters with an
excessively long modulus is that the modulus is too large. We should not
be performing time consuming checks using that modulus.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21452)
Test that a valid certificate policy is accepted and that an invalid
certificate policy is rejected. Specifically we are checking that a
leaf certificate with an invalid policy is detected.
Related-to: CVE-2023-0465
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588)
If there is no EC specified, the test won't pass.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20572)
(cherry picked from commit f5935fcf8e)
These trees have pathological properties with respect to building. The small
tree stays within the imposed limit, the large tree doesn't.
The large tree would consume over 150Gb of RAM to process.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20569)
The test tries to use DES but that may not be available.
But for the purpose of regression testing CVE-2023-0215
the cipher is not relevant, so we use AES-128 instead.
Fixes#20249
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20276)
(cherry picked from commit c400a1fe47)
Call PEM_read_bio_ex() and expect a failure. There should be no dangling
ptrs and therefore there should be no double free if we free the ptrs on
error.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20087)
Test that sending large app data records works correctly.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20087)
Otherwise the alloca can cause an exception.
Issue reported by Jiayi Lin.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19735)
Due to the logic flaw, possible test failures
in this test case might be ignored.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19929)
(cherry picked from commit 42061268ee)
Note: The private key is test/certs/root-ed25519.privkey.pem
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19654)
(cherry picked from commit 42f9174329)
Fixes#18183.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19081)
If the first app data record arrives before the Finished message we should
be able to buffer it and move on to the Finished message.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18976)
This tests the behavior and API of the EC_KEY_set_private_key function.
It tests compliance with legacy features related to NULL private keys
too.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18874)
If an IP address prefix value is supplied that is too large then a crash
can result. v2i_IPAddrBlocks() should sanity check the prefix value, as
should X509v3_addr_add_prefix().
Reported by Theo Buehler (@botovq)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18847)
(cherry picked from commit 9b887d5d5a)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18847)
PR #18129 broke the scenario of signing a certificate (not CSR) with
different-sized key. This works in 3.0, so port the fix from 3.0
(which is to only update the issuer for a request).
Partially undo #18129, but keep setting the issuer only for a CSR
Create two certs (a and ca) then sign a with c (into b):
```
openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout a-key.pem -out a-cert.pem -days 365 -nodes -subj /CN=a.example.com
openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:4096 -keyout ${HERE}/ca-key.pem -out ${HERE}/ca-cert.pem -days 3650 -nodes -subj /CN=ca.example.com
openssl x509 -in a-cert.pem -CA ca-cert.pem -CAkey ca-key.pem -set_serial '1234567890' -preserve_dates -sha256 -out b-cert.pem
```
The above succeeds in 1.1.1n and 3.0, fails in 1.1.1o (which includes #18129)
The issue in #16080 is also fixed.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18836)
Add test vectors for AES OCB for x86 AES-NI multiple of 96 byte issue.
Co-authored-by: Alejandro Sedeño <asedeno@google.com>
Co-authored-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
range_should_be_prefix() was misidentifying whether an IP address range
should in fact be represented as a prefix. This was due to a bug introduced
in commit 42d7d7dd which made this incorrect change:
- OPENSSL_assert(memcmp(min, max, length) <= 0);
+ if (memcmp(min, max, length) <= 0)
+ return -1;
This error leads to incorrect DER being encoded/accepted.
Reported by Theo Buehler (@botovq)
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18524)
(cherry picked from commit 30532e59f4)
(cherry picked from commit 2c6550c6db)
There are no ASIdentifiers if OPENSSL_NO_RFC3779 is defined,
therefore the test cannot be compiled.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18634)
(cherry picked from commit b76efe61ea)
(cherry picked from commit 665ab12ed3)
Inspired by BoringSSL fix by David Benjamin.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18511)
This partially fixes a bug where, on x86_64, BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime
would sometimes return m, the modulus, when it should have returned
zero. Thanks to Guido Vranken for reporting it. It is only a partial fix
because the same bug also exists in the "rsaz" codepath.
The bug only affects zero outputs (with non-zero inputs), so we believe
it has no security impact on our cryptographic functions.
The fx is to delete lowercase bn_from_montgomery altogether, and have the
mont5 path use the same BN_from_montgomery ending as the non-mont5 path.
This only impacts the final step of the whole exponentiation and has no
measurable perf impact.
See the original BoringSSL commit
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/13c9d5c69d04485a7a8840c12185c832026c8315
for further analysis.
Original-author: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18511)
If the asnum or rdi fields are NULL and the ASIdentifiers are otherwise
subsets then this will result in a crash. Of note is that rdi will usually
be NULL.
Reported by Theo Buehler (@botovq)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18514)
(cherry picked from commit 01fc9b6bce)
Namely the smime certificates used in test_cms
will expire soon and affect tests.
Fixes#15179
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18481)
This fixes an internal error alert from the server and
an unexpected connection failure in the release version,
but a failed assertion and a server crash in the
debug version.
Reproduce this issue with a DTLS server/client like that:
./openssl s_server -dtls -mtu 1500
./openssl s_client -dtls -maxfraglen 512
In the debug version a crash happens in the Server now:
./openssl s_server -dtls -mtu 1500
Using default temp DH parameters
ACCEPT
ssl/statem/statem_dtls.c:269: OpenSSL internal error: Assertion failed: len == written
Aborted (core dumped)
While in the release version the handshake exceeds the
negotiated max fragment size, and fails because of this:
$ ./openssl s_server -dtls -mtu 1500
Using default temp DH parameters
ACCEPT
ERROR
4057152ADA7F0000:error:0A0000C2:SSL routines:do_dtls1_write:exceeds max fragment size:ssl/record/rec_layer_d1.c:826:
shutting down SSL
CONNECTION CLOSED
From the client's point of view the connection fails
with an Internal Error Alert:
$ ./openssl s_client -dtls -maxfraglen 512
Connecting to ::1
CONNECTED(00000003)
40B76343377F0000:error:0A000438:SSL routines:dtls1_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert internal error:ssl/record/rec_layer_d1.c:613:SSL alert number 80
and now the connection attempt fails unexpectedly.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18093)
(cherry picked from commit e915c3f538)
This causes the DTLS server to enter an error state:
./openssl s_server -dtls
./openssl s_client -dtls -maxfraglen 512 -sess_out s1.txt
[...]
Q
./openssl s_client -dtls -sess_in s1.txt
CONNECTED(00000003)
^C
./openssl s_client -dtls
CONNECTED(00000003)
140335537067840:error:14102410:SSL routines:dtls1_read_bytes:sslv3 alert handshake failure:ssl/record/rec_layer_d1.c:614:SSL alert number 40
At this point the dtls server needs to be restarted,
because verify_cookie_callback always fails, because
the previous cookie is checked against the current one.
The reason for this is not fully understood.
In wireshark we see the following each time:
c->s Client Hello (without cookie)
s->c Hello Verify Request (with new cookie)
s->c Alert (Level: Fatal, Description: Handshake Failure)
c->s Client Hello (echoes new cookie)
The client gives up when the Alert arrives.
The Alert is triggered because the server calls
verify_cookie_callback with the previous cookie,
although it just sent the current cookie in the
Hello Verify Request.
However this does only happen because no Alert message
is sent when the client re-connects the session with
the missing -maxfraglen option.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18094)
Tomas Mraz
Bernd Edlinger
Matt Caswell
Pauli
Richard Levitte
Hugo Landau
Daniel Fiala
Roberto Hueso Gomez
Amir Mohammadi
Christian Heimes
Todd Short
Gregor Jasny
Alex Chernyakhovsky
Nicola Tuveri