Detection for sc == NULL is performed after sc is used. Add the
check to the correct place.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/27241)
(cherry picked from commit 7f6cc862c6)
From RFC 8446:
Note: TLS defines two generic alerts (see Section 6) to use upon
failure to parse a message. Peers which receive a message which
cannot be parsed according to the syntax (e.g., have a length
extending beyond the message boundary or contain an out-of-range
length) MUST terminate the connection with a "decode_error" alert.
Peers which receive a message which is syntactically correct but
semantically invalid (e.g., a DHE share of p - 1, or an invalid enum)
MUST terminate the connection with an "illegal_parameter" alert.
A zero length cipher suite list I think is considered out of range, and
so we should return "decode_error" rather than "illegal_parameter"
Fixes#25309
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Saša Nedvědický <sashan@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/26781)
(cherry picked from commit 2ce46ad8ce)
We use REF_PRINT_COUNT to dump out the value of various reference
counters in our code
However, we commonly use this macro after an increment or decrement. On
increment its fine, but on decrement its not, because the macro
dereferences the object holding the counter value, which may be freed by
another thread, as we've given up our ref count to it prior to using the
macro.
The rule is that we can't reference memory for an object once we've
released our reference, so lets fix this by altering REF_PRINT_COUNT to
accept the value returned by CRYPTO_[UP|DOWN]_REF instead. The
eliminates the need to dereference the memory the object points to an
allows us to use the call after we release our reference count
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25664)
(cherry picked from commit dc10ffc283)
When processing a callback within libssl that applies to TLS the original
SSL object may have been created for TLS directly, or for QUIC. When making
the callback we must make sure that we use the correct SSL object. In the
case of QUIC we must not use the internal only SSL object.
Fixes#25788
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25932)
In some cases a QUIC SSL_CONNECTION object needs to get hold of a reference
to the original SSL object as created by the user. We should keep a
reference to it.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25932)
Calling the functions SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() or SSL_set_cipher_list() will
return the error "no cipher match" if no TLSv1.2 (or below) ciphers are enabled
after calling them. However this is normal behaviour for QUIC objects which do
not support TLSv1.2 ciphers. Therefore we should suppress that error in this
case.
Fixes#25878
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25886)
(cherry picked from commit 40237bf97a)
Ensure that the provided client list is non-NULL and starts with a valid
entry. When called from the ALPN callback the client list should already
have been validated by OpenSSL so this should not cause a problem. When
called from the NPN callback the client list is locally configured and
will not have already been validated. Therefore SSL_select_next_proto
should not assume that it is correctly formatted.
We implement stricter checking of the client protocol list. We also do the
same for the server list while we are about it.
CVE-2024-5535
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24717)
In TLSv1.3 we create a new session object for each ticket that we send.
We do this by duplicating the original session. If SSL_OP_NO_TICKET is in
use then the new session will be added to the session cache. However, if
early data is not in use (and therefore anti-replay protection is being
used), then multiple threads could be resuming from the same session
simultaneously. If this happens and a problem occurs on one of the threads,
then the original session object could be marked as not_resumable. When we
duplicate the session object this not_resumable status gets copied into the
new session object. The new session object is then added to the session
cache even though it is not_resumable.
Subsequently, another bug means that the session_id_length is set to 0 for
sessions that are marked as not_resumable - even though that session is
still in the cache. Once this happens the session can never be removed from
the cache. When that object gets to be the session cache tail object the
cache never shrinks again and grows indefinitely.
CVE-2024-2511
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24043)
Though support for provider-based signature algorithms was added in
ee58915 this functionality did not work with the SignatureAlgorithms
configuration command. If SignatureAlgorithms is set then the provider
sigalgs are not used and instead it used the default value.
This PR adds a check against the provider-base sigalg list when parsing
the SignatureAlgorithms value.
Based-on-patch-by: Martin Schmatz <mrt@zurich.ibm.com>
Fixes#22761
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22779)
(cherry picked from commit 4169d58c85)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23581)
(cherry picked from commit 5c16e9d384)
We had two functions which were very similarly named, that did almost the
same thing, but not quite. We bring the two together. Doing this also fixes
a possible bug where some data may not be correctly freed when the
RECORD_LAYER_clear() version was used.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23256)
(cherry picked from commit 4a0e4849af)
When we clear the record layer, we better make sure we clear all relevant
fields, otherwise we can get ourselves into an unexpected state.
Fixes#23255
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23256)
(cherry picked from commit 5fb065589d)
Signed-off-by: lan1120 <lanming@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23045)
(cherry picked from commit e8e95f20a9)
We don't need the decoded X.509 Full(0) certificate for the EE usages 1 and 3,
because the leaf certificate is always part of the presented chain, so the
certificate is only validated as well-formed, and then discarded, but the
TLSA record is of course still used after the validation step.
Added DANE test cases for: 3 0 0, 3 1 0, 1 0 0, and 1 1 0
Reported by Claus Assmann.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22821)
(cherry picked from commit f636e7e6bd)
Instead of trying to move the doomed sct back
to the src stack, which may fail as well, simply
free the sct object, as the src list will be
deleted anyway.
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22762)
(cherry picked from commit a435d78604)
Several error cases leak either the X509 object
or the pkey or the danetls_record object.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22743)
(cherry picked from commit e4a94bcc77)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit 8dc82c0255)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit b419fccad7)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit b9788ce6a8)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit 24844be16f)
Return SSL_SENT_SHUTDOWN and SSL_RECEIVED_SHUTDOWN with semantics
similar to TLS connections.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22408)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21979)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21979)
This commit introduces two key improvements:
1. Improve code safety by replacing the conditional statement with
`if (n >= size)` and using OPENSSL_strnlen() instead of strlen().
This change ensures proper buffer size handling and adheres to
secure coding practices.
2. Enhance code readability by substituting `strcpy(p, c->name)` with
`memcpy(p, c->name, n)`. This adjustment prioritizes code clarity and
maintenance, even while mitigating a minimal buffer overflow risk.
These enhancements bolster the code's robustness and comprehensibility,
aligning with secure coding principles and best practices.
Fixes#19837
Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21934)
Found by running the checkpatch.pl Linux script to enforce coding style.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21468)
For some of the items we add FUTURE/SERVER/TESTING/MULTIPATH
designation to indicate these do not need to be resolved
in QUIC MVP release.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21539)
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21636)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20061)
openssl-machine
Graham Leggett
Neil Horman
Matt Caswell
Tomas Mraz
Alex Bozarth
Hugo Landau
lan1120
Viktor Dukhovni
Bernd Edlinger
atishkov
Sumitra Sharma
Dimitri Papadopoulos
Frederik Wedel-Heinen