the permitted signature algorithms for server and client authentication
are the same but it is now possible to set different algorithms for client
authentication only.
is required by client or server. An application can decide which
certificate chain to present based on arbitrary criteria: for example
supported signature algorithms. Add very simple example to s_server.
This fixes many of the problems and restrictions of the existing client
certificate callback: for example you can now clear existing certificates
and specify the whole chain.
the certificate can be used for (if anything). Set valid_flags field
in new tls1_check_chain function. Simplify ssl_set_cert_masks which used
to have similar checks in it.
Add new "cert_flags" field to CERT structure and include a "strict mode".
This enforces some TLS certificate requirements (such as only permitting
certificate signature algorithms contained in the supported algorithms
extension) which some implementations ignore: this option should be used
with caution as it could cause interoperability issues.
Only store encoded versions of peer and configured signature algorithms.
Determine shared signature algorithms and cache the result along with NID
equivalents of each algorithm.
TLS v1.2. These are sent as an extension for clients and during a certificate
request for servers.
TODO: add support for shared signature algorithms, respect shared algorithms
when deciding which ciphersuites and certificates to permit.
enabled instead of requiring an application to hard code a (possibly
inappropriate) parameter set and delve into EC internals we just
automatically use the preferred curve.
Tidy some code up.
Don't allocate a structure to handle ECC extensions when it is used for
default values.
Make supported curves configurable.
Add ctrls to retrieve shared curves: not fully integrated with rest of
ECC code yet.
algorithms extension (including everything we support). Swicth to new
signature format where needed and relax ECC restrictions.
Not TLS v1.2 client certifcate support yet but client will handle case
where a certificate is requested and we don't have one.
signature algorithms extension and correct signature format for
server key exchange.
All ciphersuites should now work on the server but no client support and
no client certificate support yet.
Submitted by: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@randombit.net>, "Mounir IDRASSI" <mounir.idrassi@idrix.net>, steve
Reviewed by: steve
As required by RFC4492 an absent supported points format by a server is
not an error: it should be treated as equivalent to an extension only
containing uncompressed.
Dr. Stephen Henson
Ben Laurie
Bodo Möller