While posix_memalign() is generally not expected to fail, we can always use
the internal aligned alloc implementation to ensure that any
OPENSSL_aligned_malloc failure is indeed fatal and does not require
a fallback.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Saša Nedvědický <sashan@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/28295)
Originally, CRYPTO_aligned_alloc() returned NULL if OpenSSL was built
with OPENSSL_SMALL_FOOTPRINT defined, which is a weird place for such
a consideration; moreover it means that every caller requires to
implement some form of a fallback (and manually over-allocate
and then align the returned memory if the alignment is a requirement),
which is counter-productive (and outright ridiculous in environments
with posix_memalign() available). Move the OPENSSL_SMALL_FOOTPRINT
consideration to the only current caller and update the documentation
and tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Saša Nedvědický <sashan@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/28295)
Eugene Syromiatnikov