mirror of https://github.com/openssl/openssl.git
				
				
				
			
		
			
				
	
	
		
			106 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			106 lines
		
	
	
		
			4.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
=pod
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
=head1 NAME
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
openssl-threads - Overview of thread safety in OpenSSL
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
=head1 DESCRIPTION
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In this man page, we use the term B<thread-safe> to indicate that an
 | 
						|
object or function can be used by multiple threads at the same time.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
OpenSSL can be built with or without threads support. The most important
 | 
						|
use of this support is so that OpenSSL itself can use a single consistent
 | 
						|
API, as shown in L<CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once(3)/EXAMPLES>.
 | 
						|
Multi-platform applications can also use this API.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In particular, being configured for threads support does not imply that
 | 
						|
all OpenSSL objects are thread-safe.
 | 
						|
To emphasize: I<most objects are not safe for simultaneous use>.
 | 
						|
Exceptions to this should be documented on the specific manual pages, and
 | 
						|
some general high-level guidance is given here.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
One major use of the OpenSSL thread API is to implement reference counting.
 | 
						|
Many objects within OpenSSL are reference-counted, so resources are not
 | 
						|
released, until the last reference is removed.
 | 
						|
References are often increased automatically (such as when an B<X509>
 | 
						|
certificate object is added into an B<X509_STORE> trust store).
 | 
						|
There is often an B<I<object>_up_ref>() function that can be used to increase
 | 
						|
the reference count.
 | 
						|
Failure to match B<I<object>_up_ref>() calls with the right number of
 | 
						|
B<I<object>_free>() calls is a common source of memory leaks when a program
 | 
						|
exits.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Many objects have set and get API's to set attributes in the object.
 | 
						|
A C<set0> passes ownership from the caller to the object and a
 | 
						|
C<get0> returns a pointer but the attribute ownership
 | 
						|
remains with the object and a reference to it is returned.
 | 
						|
A C<set1> or C<get1> function does not change the ownership, but instead
 | 
						|
updates the attribute's reference count so that the object is shared
 | 
						|
between the caller and the object; the caller must free the returned
 | 
						|
attribute when finished.
 | 
						|
Functions that involve attributes that have reference counts themselves,
 | 
						|
but are named with just C<set> or C<get> are historical; and the documentation
 | 
						|
must state how the references are handled.
 | 
						|
Get methods are often thread-safe as long as the ownership requirements are
 | 
						|
met and shared objects are not modified.
 | 
						|
Set methods, or modifying shared objects, are generally not thread-safe
 | 
						|
as discussed below.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Objects are thread-safe
 | 
						|
as long as the API's being invoked don't modify the object; in this
 | 
						|
case the parameter is usually marked in the API as C<const>.
 | 
						|
Not all parameters are marked this way.
 | 
						|
Note that a C<const> declaration does not mean immutable; for example
 | 
						|
L<X509_cmp(3)> takes pointers to C<const> objects, but the implementation
 | 
						|
uses a C cast to remove that so it can lock objects, generate and cache
 | 
						|
a DER encoding, and so on.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Another instance of thread-safety is when updates to an object's
 | 
						|
internal state, such as cached values, are done with locks.
 | 
						|
One example of this is the reference counting API's described above.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In all cases, however, it is generally not safe for one thread to
 | 
						|
mutate an object, such as setting elements of a private or public key,
 | 
						|
while another thread is using that object, such as verifying a signature.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The same API's can usually be used simultaneously on different objects
 | 
						|
without interference.
 | 
						|
For example, two threads can calculate a signature using two different
 | 
						|
B<EVP_PKEY_CTX> objects.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
For implicit global state or singletons, thread-safety depends on the facility.
 | 
						|
The L<CRYPTO_secure_malloc(3)> and related API's have their own lock,
 | 
						|
while L<CRYPTO_malloc(3)> assumes the underlying platform allocation
 | 
						|
will do any necessary locking.
 | 
						|
Some API's, such as L<NCONF_load(3)> and related, or L<OBJ_create(3)>
 | 
						|
do no locking at all; this can be considered a bug.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A separate, although related, issue is modifying "factory" objects
 | 
						|
when other objects have been created from that.
 | 
						|
For example, an B<SSL_CTX> object created by L<SSL_CTX_new(3)> is used
 | 
						|
to create per-connection B<SSL> objects by calling L<SSL_new(3)>.
 | 
						|
In this specific case, and probably for factory methods in general, it is
 | 
						|
not safe to modify the factory object after it has been used to create
 | 
						|
other objects.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
=head1 SEE ALSO
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once(3),
 | 
						|
local system threads documentation.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
=head1 BUGS
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This page is admittedly very incomplete.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
=head1 COPYRIGHT
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Copyright 2021 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Licensed under the Apache License 2.0 (the "License").  You may not use
 | 
						|
this file except in compliance with the License.  You can obtain a copy
 | 
						|
in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at
 | 
						|
L<https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html>.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
=cut
 |