rabbitmq-server/scripts/rabbitmq-defaults.bat

18 lines
355 B
Batchfile
Raw Normal View History

@echo off
Move most of shell scripts to Erlang code A large part of the rabbitmq-server(8) and CLI scripts, both Bourne-shell and Windows Batch versions, was moved to Erlang code and the RabbitMQ startup procedure was reorganized to be closer to a regular Erlang application. A new application called `rabbitmq_prelaunch` is responsible for: 1. Querying the environment variables to initialize important variables (using the new `rabbit_env` module in rabbitmq-common). 2. Checking the compatibility with the Erlang/OTP runtime. 3. Configuring Erlang distribution. 5. Writing the PID file. The application is started early (i.e. it is started before `rabbit`). The `rabbit` application runs the second half of the prelaunch sequence at the beginning of the application `start()` function. This second phase is responsible for the following steps: 1. Preparing the feature flags registry. 2. Reading and validating the configuration. 3. Configuring logging. 4. Running the various cluster checks. In addition to this prelaunch sequence, the `rabbit` application start procedure ends with a "postlaunch" sequence which takes care of starting enabled plugins. Thanks to this, RabbitMQ can be started with `application:start(rabbit)` as any other Erlang application. The only caveats are: * Mnesia must be stopped at the time `rabbit_prelaunch` is started, and must remain stopped when `rabbit` is started, to allow the Erlang distribution setup and cluster checks. `rabbit` takes care of starting Mnesia. * Likewise for Ra, because it relies on the `ra` application environment to be configured. Transitioning from scripts to Erlang code has the following benefits: * RabbitMQ start behavior should be identical between Unix and Windows. Also, features should be on par now. For instance, RabbitMQ now writes a PID file on Windows, like it always did on Unix-based systems. * The difference between published packages and a development environment are greatly reduced. In fact, we removed all the "if this is a dev working copy, then ..." blocks. As part of that, the `rabbit` application is now treated like its plugins: it is packaged as an `.ez` archive and written to the `plugins` directory (even though it is not technically a plugin). Also in a development copy, the CLI is copied to the top-level project. So when testing a plugin for instance, the CLI to use is `sbin/rabbitmqctl` in the current directory, not the master copy in `rabbit/scripts`. * As a consequence of the previous two points, maintaining and testing on Windows is now made easy. It should even be possible to setup CI on Windows. * There are less issues with paths containing non-US-ASCII characters, which can happen on Windows because RabbitMQ stores its data in user directories by default. This process brings at least one more benefit: we now have early logging during this prelaunch phase, which eases diagnostics and debugging. There are also behavior changes: * The new format configuration files used to be converted to an Erlang-term-based file by the Cuttlefish CLI. To do that, configuration schemas were copied to a temporary directory and the generated configuration file was written to RabbitMQ data directory. Now, Cuttlefish is used as a library: everything happens in memory. No schemas are copied, no generated configuration is written to disk. * The PID file is removed when the Erlang VM exits. * The `rabbit_config` module was trimmed significantly because most of the configuration handling is done in `rabbit_prelaunch_conf` now. * The RabbitMQ nodename does not appear on the command line, therefore it is missing from ps(1) and top(1) output. * The `rabbit:start()` function will probably behave differently in some ways because it defers everything to the Erlang application controller (instead of reimplementing it).
2019-05-15 22:27:51 +08:00
set SASL_BOOT_FILE=start_sasl
set CLEAN_BOOT_FILE=start_clean
Move most of shell scripts to Erlang code A large part of the rabbitmq-server(8) and CLI scripts, both Bourne-shell and Windows Batch versions, was moved to Erlang code and the RabbitMQ startup procedure was reorganized to be closer to a regular Erlang application. A new application called `rabbitmq_prelaunch` is responsible for: 1. Querying the environment variables to initialize important variables (using the new `rabbit_env` module in rabbitmq-common). 2. Checking the compatibility with the Erlang/OTP runtime. 3. Configuring Erlang distribution. 5. Writing the PID file. The application is started early (i.e. it is started before `rabbit`). The `rabbit` application runs the second half of the prelaunch sequence at the beginning of the application `start()` function. This second phase is responsible for the following steps: 1. Preparing the feature flags registry. 2. Reading and validating the configuration. 3. Configuring logging. 4. Running the various cluster checks. In addition to this prelaunch sequence, the `rabbit` application start procedure ends with a "postlaunch" sequence which takes care of starting enabled plugins. Thanks to this, RabbitMQ can be started with `application:start(rabbit)` as any other Erlang application. The only caveats are: * Mnesia must be stopped at the time `rabbit_prelaunch` is started, and must remain stopped when `rabbit` is started, to allow the Erlang distribution setup and cluster checks. `rabbit` takes care of starting Mnesia. * Likewise for Ra, because it relies on the `ra` application environment to be configured. Transitioning from scripts to Erlang code has the following benefits: * RabbitMQ start behavior should be identical between Unix and Windows. Also, features should be on par now. For instance, RabbitMQ now writes a PID file on Windows, like it always did on Unix-based systems. * The difference between published packages and a development environment are greatly reduced. In fact, we removed all the "if this is a dev working copy, then ..." blocks. As part of that, the `rabbit` application is now treated like its plugins: it is packaged as an `.ez` archive and written to the `plugins` directory (even though it is not technically a plugin). Also in a development copy, the CLI is copied to the top-level project. So when testing a plugin for instance, the CLI to use is `sbin/rabbitmqctl` in the current directory, not the master copy in `rabbit/scripts`. * As a consequence of the previous two points, maintaining and testing on Windows is now made easy. It should even be possible to setup CI on Windows. * There are less issues with paths containing non-US-ASCII characters, which can happen on Windows because RabbitMQ stores its data in user directories by default. This process brings at least one more benefit: we now have early logging during this prelaunch phase, which eases diagnostics and debugging. There are also behavior changes: * The new format configuration files used to be converted to an Erlang-term-based file by the Cuttlefish CLI. To do that, configuration schemas were copied to a temporary directory and the generated configuration file was written to RabbitMQ data directory. Now, Cuttlefish is used as a library: everything happens in memory. No schemas are copied, no generated configuration is written to disk. * The PID file is removed when the Erlang VM exits. * The `rabbit_config` module was trimmed significantly because most of the configuration handling is done in `rabbit_prelaunch_conf` now. * The RabbitMQ nodename does not appear on the command line, therefore it is missing from ps(1) and top(1) output. * The `rabbit:start()` function will probably behave differently in some ways because it defers everything to the Erlang application controller (instead of reimplementing it).
2019-05-15 22:27:51 +08:00
set BOOT_MODULE=rabbit
if "!RABBITMQ_BASE!"=="" (
set RABBITMQ_BASE=!APPDATA!\RabbitMQ
) else (
set RABBITMQ_BASE=!RABBITMQ_BASE:"=!
)
if not exist "!RABBITMQ_BASE!" (
mkdir "!RABBITMQ_BASE!"
)
set CONF_ENV_FILE=!RABBITMQ_BASE!\rabbitmq-env-conf.bat