Fixed alignment of the comment about the constant field
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b32014455
commit
d6960cf5af
|
|
@ -44,9 +44,10 @@
|
|||
-record(exchange, {name, type, durable, auto_delete, arguments}).
|
||||
|
||||
-record(amqqueue, {name, durable, auto_delete, arguments, pid}).
|
||||
%% This constant field seems to be required because the underlying storage is
|
||||
%% ets, which stores key value pairs
|
||||
|
||||
%% In the route and reverse route record definitions,
|
||||
%% theconstant field seems to be required because the
|
||||
%% underlying storage is ets, which stores key value pairs.
|
||||
%% The binding field is made up of an {Exchange, Binding, Queue}
|
||||
-record(route, {binding, value = const}).
|
||||
%% The reverse_binding field is made up of an {Queue, Binding, Exchange}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue