Providing a pre-hashed and salted password is
not significantly more secure but satisfies those
who cannot pass clear text passwords on the command
line for regulatory reasons.
Note that the optimal way of seeding users is still
definition import on node boot, not scripting with
CLI tools.
Closes#9166
Because both `add_member` and `grow` default to Membership status `promotable`,
new members will have to catch up before they are considered cluster members.
This can be overridden with either `voter` or (permanent `non_voter` statuses.
The latter one is useless without additional tooling so kept undocumented.
- non-voters do not affect quorum size for election purposes
- `observer_cli` reports their status with lowercase 'f'
- `rabbitmq-queues check_if_node_is_quorum_critical` takes voter status into
account
[Why]
Mnesia is a very powerful and convenient tool for Erlang applications:
it is a persistent disc-based database, it handles replication accross
multiple Erlang nodes and it is available out-of-the-box from the
Erlang/OTP distribution. RabbitMQ relies on Mnesia to manage all its
metadata:
* virtual hosts' properties
* intenal users
* queue, exchange and binding declarations (not queues data)
* runtime parameters and policies
* ...
Unfortunately Mnesia makes it difficult to handle network partition and,
as a consequence, the merge conflicts between Erlang nodes once the
network partition is resolved. RabbitMQ provides several partition
handling strategies but they are not bullet-proof. Users still hit
situations where it is a pain to repair a cluster following a network
partition.
[How]
@kjnilsson created Ra [1], a Raft consensus library that RabbitMQ
already uses successfully to implement quorum queues and streams for
instance. Those queues do not suffer from network partitions.
We created Khepri [2], a new persistent and replicated database engine
based on Ra and we want to use it in place of Mnesia in RabbitMQ to
solve the problems with network partitions.
This patch integrates Khepri as an experimental feature. When enabled,
RabbitMQ will store all its metadata in Khepri instead of Mnesia.
This change comes with behavior changes. While Khepri remains disabled,
you should see no changes to the behavior of RabbitMQ. If there are
changes, it is a bug. After Khepri is enabled, there are significant
changes of behavior that you should be aware of.
Because it is based on the Raft consensus algorithm, when there is a
network partition, only the cluster members that are in the partition
with at least `(Number of nodes in the cluster ÷ 2) + 1` number of nodes
can "make progress". In other words, only those nodes may write to the
Khepri database and read from the database and expect a consistent
result.
For instance in a cluster of 5 RabbitMQ nodes:
* If there are two partitions, one with 3 nodes, one with 2 nodes, only
the group of 3 nodes will be able to write to the database.
* If there are three partitions, two with 2 nodes, one with 1 node, none
of the group can write to the database.
Because the Khepri database will be used for all kind of metadata, it
means that RabbitMQ nodes that can't write to the database will be
unable to perform some operations. A list of operations and what to
expect is documented in the associated pull request and the RabbitMQ
website.
This requirement from Raft also affects the startup of RabbitMQ nodes in
a cluster. Indeed, at least a quorum number of nodes must be started at
once to allow nodes to become ready.
To enable Khepri, you need to enable the `khepri_db` feature flag:
rabbitmqctl enable_feature_flag khepri_db
When the `khepri_db` feature flag is enabled, the migration code
performs the following two tasks:
1. It synchronizes the Khepri cluster membership from the Mnesia
cluster. It uses `mnesia_to_khepri:sync_cluster_membership/1` from
the `khepri_mnesia_migration` application [3].
2. It copies data from relevant Mnesia tables to Khepri, doing some
conversion if necessary on the way. Again, it uses
`mnesia_to_khepri:copy_tables/4` from `khepri_mnesia_migration` to do
it.
This can be performed on a running standalone RabbitMQ node or cluster.
Data will be migrated from Mnesia to Khepri without any service
interruption. Note that during the migration, the performance may
decrease and the memory footprint may go up.
Because this feature flag is considered experimental, it is not enabled
by default even on a brand new RabbitMQ deployment.
More about the implementation details below:
In the past months, all accesses to Mnesia were isolated in a collection
of `rabbit_db*` modules. This is where the integration of Khepri mostly
takes place: we use a function called `rabbit_khepri:handle_fallback/1`
which selects the database and perform the query or the transaction.
Here is an example from `rabbit_db_vhost`:
* Up until RabbitMQ 3.12.x:
get(VHostName) when is_binary(VHostName) ->
get_in_mnesia(VHostName).
* Starting with RabbitMQ 3.13.0:
get(VHostName) when is_binary(VHostName) ->
rabbit_khepri:handle_fallback(
#{mnesia => fun() -> get_in_mnesia(VHostName) end,
khepri => fun() -> get_in_khepri(VHostName) end}).
This `rabbit_khepri:handle_fallback/1` function relies on two things:
1. the fact that the `khepri_db` feature flag is enabled, in which case
it always executes the Khepri-based variant.
4. the ability or not to read and write to Mnesia tables otherwise.
Before the feature flag is enabled, or during the migration, the
function will try to execute the Mnesia-based variant. If it succeeds,
then it returns the result. If it fails because one or more Mnesia
tables can't be used, it restarts from scratch: it means the feature
flag is being enabled and depending on the outcome, either the
Mnesia-based variant will succeed (the feature flag couldn't be enabled)
or the feature flag will be marked as enabled and it will call the
Khepri-based variant. The meat of this function really lives in the
`khepri_mnesia_migration` application [3] and
`rabbit_khepri:handle_fallback/1` is a wrapper on top of it that knows
about the feature flag.
However, some calls to the database do not depend on the existence of
Mnesia tables, such as functions where we need to learn about the
members of a cluster. For those, we can't rely on exceptions from
Mnesia. Therefore, we just look at the state of the feature flag to
determine which database to use. There are two situations though:
* Sometimes, we need the feature flag state query to block because the
function interested in it can't return a valid answer during the
migration. Here is an example:
case rabbit_khepri:is_enabled(RemoteNode) of
true -> can_join_using_khepri(RemoteNode);
false -> can_join_using_mnesia(RemoteNode)
end
* Sometimes, we need the feature flag state query to NOT block (for
instance because it would cause a deadlock). Here is an example:
case rabbit_khepri:get_feature_state() of
enabled -> members_using_khepri();
_ -> members_using_mnesia()
end
Direct accesses to Mnesia still exists. They are limited to code that is
specific to Mnesia such as classic queue mirroring or network partitions
handling strategies.
Now, to discover the Mnesia tables to migrate and how to migrate them,
we use an Erlang module attribute called
`rabbit_mnesia_tables_to_khepri_db` which indicates a list of Mnesia
tables and an associated converter module. Here is an example in the
`rabbitmq_recent_history_exchange` plugin:
-rabbit_mnesia_tables_to_khepri_db(
[{?RH_TABLE, rabbit_db_rh_exchange_m2k_converter}]).
The converter module — `rabbit_db_rh_exchange_m2k_converter` in this
example — is is fact a "sub" converter module called but
`rabbit_db_m2k_converter`. See the documentation of a `mnesia_to_khepri`
converter module to learn more about these modules.
[1] https://github.com/rabbitmq/ra
[2] https://github.com/rabbitmq/khepri
[3] https://github.com/rabbitmq/khepri_mnesia_migration
See #7206.
Co-authored-by: Jean-Sébastien Pédron <jean-sebastien@rabbitmq.com>
Co-authored-by: Diana Parra Corbacho <dparracorbac@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Davis <mcarsondavis@gmail.com>
[Why]
When a single node or a cluster is initialized, we go through a few
steps which are not Mnesia-specific or even related. For instance, we
verify that both ends are compatible w.r.t. feature flags.
When we will introduce Khepri, we will have to go through the same
generic steps. Therefore, it makes sense to drive those steps from
`rabbit_db_cluster` and only call into `rabbit_mnesia` when needed.
[How]
The generic code is moved from `rabbit_mnesia` to `rabbit_db_cluster`.
Introduce 'ctl update_vhost_metadata'
that can be used to update the description, tags or default queue type of
any existing virtual hosts.
Closes#7912, #7857.
#7912 will need an HTTP API counterpart change.
Testcases are executed in a random order. Unfortunately, this testcase
depended on side effects of other testcases. If this testcase was
executed first, then there were no permissions set and the testcase
would fail.
It now lists permissions before and after the actual test and compare
both.
`rabbitmqctl add_vhost myvhost --tags "my_tag"` would not previously
conform "my_tag" to a list before setting vhost metadata, which could
cause crashes when the list was read.
RabbitMQ lacks argument verifications in many places unfortunately.
Several testcases were passing bad arguments to the command but were
also comparing the result to bad data. This happened to "work"...
The location and name of this directory remains the same for
compatibility reasons. Therefore, it sill contains "mnesia" in its name.
However, semantically, we want this directory to be unrelated to Mnesia.
In the end, many subsystems write files and directories there, including
Mnesia, all Ra systems and in the future, Khepri.
In many tests, we do not care what is the complete set of plugins
running on a node (or present, or in a specific state). We only
care that a few select ones are running, are of the expected version,
in a certain state, and so on.
So list comparison assertions are counterproductive and lead to
test interference that is difficult to track down. In many cases
we can do more fine grained assertions and ignore the rest of
the plugins present on the node.
References #6289, #6020.
This category should be unused with the decommissioning of the old
upgrade subsystem (in favor of the feature flags subsystem). It means:
1. The upgrade log file will not be created by default anymore.
2. The `$RABBITMQ_UPGRADE_LOG` environment variable is now unsupported.
The configuration variables remain to avoid breaking an existing and
working configuration.
Michael Klishin
Alex Valiushko
Diana Parra Corbacho
Ayanda-D
Jean-Sébastien Pédron
Michael Davis
Rin Kuryloski
Michael Klishin
Michal Kuratczyk
Simon Unge
Jean-Sébastien Pédron
Ayanda Dube