Remove @Aspect for classes containing only @Pointcut declarations in ref docs
Closes gh-30790
This commit is contained in:
parent
3c05679a97
commit
040ea0a97c
|
|
@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ Java::
|
|||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class Pointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(public * *(..))")
|
||||
|
|
@ -179,7 +178,6 @@ Kotlin::
|
|||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class Pointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(public * *(..))")
|
||||
|
|
@ -211,9 +209,9 @@ pointcut matching.
|
|||
|
||||
When working with enterprise applications, developers often have the need to refer to
|
||||
modules of the application and particular sets of operations from within several aspects.
|
||||
We recommend defining a dedicated aspect that captures commonly used _named pointcut_
|
||||
expressions for this purpose. Such an aspect typically resembles the following
|
||||
`CommonPointcuts` example (though what you name the aspect is up to you):
|
||||
We recommend defining a dedicated class that captures commonly used _named pointcut_
|
||||
expressions for this purpose. Such a class typically resembles the following
|
||||
`CommonPointcuts` example (though what you name the class is up to you):
|
||||
|
||||
[tabs]
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
|
@ -223,10 +221,8 @@ Java::
|
|||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut;
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
public class CommonPointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
@ -287,10 +283,8 @@ Kotlin::
|
|||
----
|
||||
package com.xyz
|
||||
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
|
||||
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
class CommonPointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
@ -346,9 +340,9 @@ Kotlin::
|
|||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
You can refer to the pointcuts defined in such an aspect anywhere you need a pointcut
|
||||
expression by referencing the fully-qualified name of the `@Aspect` class combined with
|
||||
the `@Pointcut` method's name. For example, to make the service layer transactional, you
|
||||
You can refer to the pointcuts defined in such a class anywhere you need a pointcut
|
||||
expression by referencing the fully-qualified name of the class combined with the
|
||||
`@Pointcut` method's name. For example, to make the service layer transactional, you
|
||||
could write the following which references the
|
||||
`com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()` _named pointcut_:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -637,17 +637,20 @@ abstract class AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactoryTests {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static class CommonPointcuts {
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* getAge())")
|
||||
void getAge() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Aspect
|
||||
static class NamedPointcutAspectWithFQN {
|
||||
|
||||
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
|
||||
private ITestBean fieldThatShouldBeIgnoredBySpringAtAspectJProcessing = new TestBean();
|
||||
|
||||
@Pointcut("execution(* getAge())")
|
||||
void getAge() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Around("org.springframework.aop.aspectj.annotation.AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactoryTests.NamedPointcutAspectWithFQN.getAge()")
|
||||
@Around("org.springframework.aop.aspectj.annotation.AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactoryTests.CommonPointcuts.getAge()()")
|
||||
int changeReturnValue(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) {
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue