Remove @Aspect for classes containing only @Pointcut declarations in ref docs

Closes gh-30790
This commit is contained in:
Sam Brannen 2023-07-01 17:41:55 +02:00
parent 3c05679a97
commit 040ea0a97c
2 changed files with 14 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -154,7 +154,6 @@ Java::
----
package com.xyz;
@Aspect
public class Pointcuts {
@Pointcut("execution(public * *(..))")
@ -179,7 +178,6 @@ Kotlin::
----
package com.xyz
@Aspect
class Pointcuts {
@Pointcut("execution(public * *(..))")
@ -211,9 +209,9 @@ pointcut matching.
When working with enterprise applications, developers often have the need to refer to
modules of the application and particular sets of operations from within several aspects.
We recommend defining a dedicated aspect that captures commonly used _named pointcut_
expressions for this purpose. Such an aspect typically resembles the following
`CommonPointcuts` example (though what you name the aspect is up to you):
We recommend defining a dedicated class that captures commonly used _named pointcut_
expressions for this purpose. Such a class typically resembles the following
`CommonPointcuts` example (though what you name the class is up to you):
[tabs]
======
@ -223,10 +221,8 @@ Java::
----
package com.xyz;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut;
@Aspect
public class CommonPointcuts {
/**
@ -287,10 +283,8 @@ Kotlin::
----
package com.xyz
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Pointcut
@Aspect
class CommonPointcuts {
/**
@ -346,9 +340,9 @@ Kotlin::
----
======
You can refer to the pointcuts defined in such an aspect anywhere you need a pointcut
expression by referencing the fully-qualified name of the `@Aspect` class combined with
the `@Pointcut` method's name. For example, to make the service layer transactional, you
You can refer to the pointcuts defined in such a class anywhere you need a pointcut
expression by referencing the fully-qualified name of the class combined with the
`@Pointcut` method's name. For example, to make the service layer transactional, you
could write the following which references the
`com.xyz.CommonPointcuts.businessService()` _named pointcut_:

View File

@ -637,17 +637,20 @@ abstract class AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactoryTests {
}
static class CommonPointcuts {
@Pointcut("execution(* getAge())")
void getAge() {
}
}
@Aspect
static class NamedPointcutAspectWithFQN {
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
private ITestBean fieldThatShouldBeIgnoredBySpringAtAspectJProcessing = new TestBean();
@Pointcut("execution(* getAge())")
void getAge() {
}
@Around("org.springframework.aop.aspectj.annotation.AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactoryTests.NamedPointcutAspectWithFQN.getAge()")
@Around("org.springframework.aop.aspectj.annotation.AbstractAspectJAdvisorFactoryTests.CommonPointcuts.getAge()()")
int changeReturnValue(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp) {
return -1;
}