revised section on inheriting annotations from interfaces
This commit is contained in:
parent
31144591b0
commit
3ffc2ba48d
|
@ -1416,9 +1416,7 @@ public class DefaultFooService implements FooService {
|
|||
<interfacename>@Transactional</interfacename> annotation is not enough
|
||||
to activate the transactional behavior. The
|
||||
<interfacename>@Transactional</interfacename> annotation is simply
|
||||
metadata that can be consumed by something<!--Please identify *something* .
|
||||
TR: OK AS IS.it's not defined what this something is. could be code written by the user or could be an
|
||||
existing BeanPostProcessor provided or something else--> that is
|
||||
metadata that can be consumed by some runtime infrastructure that is
|
||||
<interfacename>@Transactional</interfacename>-aware and that can use the
|
||||
metadata to configure the appropriate beans with transactional behavior.
|
||||
In the preceding example, the
|
||||
|
@ -1433,8 +1431,8 @@ existing BeanPostProcessor provided or something else--> that is
|
|||
<interfacename>@Transactional</interfacename> annotation on an
|
||||
interface (or an interface method), but this works only as you would
|
||||
expect it to if you are using interface-based proxies. The fact that
|
||||
annotations are <emphasis>not inherited</emphasis> means that if you
|
||||
are using class-based proxies
|
||||
Java annotations are <emphasis>not inherited from interfaces</emphasis>
|
||||
means that if you are using class-based proxies
|
||||
(<literal>proxy-target-class="true"</literal>) or the weaving-based
|
||||
aspect (<literal>mode="aspectj"</literal>), then the transaction
|
||||
settings are not recognized by the proxying and weaving
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue