changed J2EE to Java EE
This commit is contained in:
parent
40c4941cbf
commit
4bf3a9c9bd
|
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
|
|||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para><emphasis>Aspect</emphasis>: a modularization of a concern
|
||||
that cuts across multiple classes. Transaction management is a good
|
||||
example of a crosscutting concern in J2EE applications. In Spring
|
||||
example of a crosscutting concern in Java EE applications. In Spring
|
||||
AOP, aspects are implemented using regular classes (the <link
|
||||
linkend="aop-schema">schema-based approach</link>) or regular
|
||||
classes annotated with the <interfacename>@Aspect</interfacename>
|
||||
|
|
@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<para>Spring AOP is implemented in pure Java. There is no need for a
|
||||
special compilation process. Spring AOP does not need to control the
|
||||
class loader hierarchy, and is thus suitable for use in a J2EE web
|
||||
class loader hierarchy, and is thus suitable for use in a Java EE web
|
||||
container or application server.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Spring AOP currently supports only method execution join points
|
||||
|
|
@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
|
|||
efficiently with Spring AOP, such as advise very fine-grained objects
|
||||
(such as domain objects typically): AspectJ is the best choice in such
|
||||
cases. However, our experience is that Spring AOP provides an excellent
|
||||
solution to most problems in J2EE applications that are amenable to
|
||||
solution to most problems in Java EE applications that are amenable to
|
||||
AOP.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Spring AOP will never strive to compete with AspectJ to provide a
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,15 +7,15 @@
|
|||
<section id="cci-introduction">
|
||||
<title>Introduction</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>J2EE provides a specification to standardize access to enterprise
|
||||
information systems (EIS): the JCA (Java Connector Architecture). This
|
||||
<para>Java EE provides a specification to standardize access to enterprise
|
||||
information systems (EIS): the JCA (J2EE Connector Architecture). This
|
||||
specification is divided into several different parts:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>SPI (Service provider interfaces) that the connector provider
|
||||
must implement. These interfaces constitute a resource adapter which
|
||||
can be deployed on a J2EE application server. In such a scenario, the
|
||||
can be deployed on a Java EE application server. In such a scenario, the
|
||||
server manages connection pooling, transaction and security (managed
|
||||
mode). The application server is also responsible for managing the
|
||||
configuration, which is held outside the client application. A
|
||||
|
|
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
|
|||
<note>
|
||||
<para>The client side of connectors doesn't alway use CCI. Some
|
||||
connectors expose their own APIs, only providing JCA resource adapter to
|
||||
use the system contracts of a J2EE container (connection pooling, global
|
||||
use the system contracts of a Java EE container (connection pooling, global
|
||||
transactions, security). Spring does not offer special support for such
|
||||
connector-specific APIs.</para>
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
|
|
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
|
|||
<para>When you use a connector in non-managed mode, you can't use
|
||||
global transactions because the resource is never enlisted / delisted
|
||||
in the current global transaction of the current thread. The resource
|
||||
is simply not aware of any global J2EE transactions that might be
|
||||
is simply not aware of any global Java EE transactions that might be
|
||||
running.</para>
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
|
@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ interactionSpec.setInteractionVerb(ECIInteractionSpec.SYNC_SEND_RECEIVE);</progr
|
|||
<property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory"/>
|
||||
</bean></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In managed mode (that is, in a J2EE environment), the
|
||||
<para>In managed mode (that is, in a Java EE environment), the
|
||||
configuration could look as follows:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting language="xml"><jee:jndi-lookup id="connectionFactory" jndi-name="eis/cicseci"/>
|
||||
|
|
@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ MyMappingRecordOperation eisOperation = new MyMappingRecordOperation(getConnecti
|
|||
database with the Blackbox CCI connector.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<note>
|
||||
<para>The original version of this connector is provided by the J2EE
|
||||
<para>The original version of this connector is provided by the Java EE
|
||||
SDK (version 1.3), available from Sun.</para>
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ MyMappingRecordOperation eisOperation = new MyMappingRecordOperation(getConnecti
|
|||
<property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory"/>
|
||||
</bean></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In managed mode (that is, in a J2EE environment), the
|
||||
<para>In managed mode (that is, in a Java EE environment), the
|
||||
configuration could look as follows:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting language="xml"><jee:jndi-lookup id="targetConnectionFactory" jndi-name="eis/blackbox"/>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ MyMappingRecordOperation eisOperation = new MyMappingRecordOperation(getConnecti
|
|||
<property name="connectionFactory" ref="connectionFactory"/>
|
||||
</bean></programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In managed mode (that is, in a J2EE environment), the
|
||||
<para>In managed mode (that is, in a Java EE environment), the
|
||||
configuration could look as follows:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting language="xml"><jee:jndi-lookup id="connectionFactory" jndi-name="eis/cicseci"/>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ MyMappingRecordOperation eisOperation = new MyMappingRecordOperation(getConnecti
|
|||
<para>For global transactions, you can use Spring's generic transaction
|
||||
infrastructure to demarcate transactions, with
|
||||
<classname>JtaTransactionManager</classname> as backend (delegating to the
|
||||
J2EE server's distributed transaction coordinator underneath).</para>
|
||||
Java EE server's distributed transaction coordinator underneath).</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>For local transactions on a single CCI
|
||||
<interfacename>ConnectionFactory</interfacename>, Spring provides a
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ jdbcTemplate.update(
|
|||
time.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>This is potentially useful for test or standalone environments
|
||||
outside of a J2EE container, either as a
|
||||
outside of a Java EE container, either as a
|
||||
<interfacename>DataSource</interfacename> bean in a Spring IoC
|
||||
container, or in conjunction with a simple JNDI environment.
|
||||
Pool-assuming <literal>Connection.close()</literal> calls will simply
|
||||
|
|
@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ jdbcTemplate.update(
|
|||
target <interfacename>DataSource</interfacename> to add awareness of
|
||||
Spring-managed transactions. In this respect it is similar to a
|
||||
transactional JNDI <interfacename>DataSource</interfacename> as provided
|
||||
by a J2EE server.</para>
|
||||
by a Java EE server.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<note>
|
||||
<para>It should almost never be necessary or desirable to use this
|
||||
|
|
@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ jdbcTemplate.update(
|
|||
|
||||
<para>Application code is required to retrieve the JDBC connection via
|
||||
<literal>DataSourceUtils.getConnection(DataSource)</literal> instead of
|
||||
J2EE's standard <literal>DataSource.getConnection</literal>. This is
|
||||
Java EE's standard <literal>DataSource.getConnection</literal>. This is
|
||||
recommended anyway, as it throws unchecked
|
||||
<literal>org.springframework.dao</literal> exceptions instead of checked
|
||||
<exceptionname>SQLExceptions</exceptionname>. All framework classes like
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
|
|||
the production and consumption of messages. The
|
||||
<classname>JmsTemplate</classname> class is used for message production
|
||||
and synchronous message reception. For asynchronous reception similar to
|
||||
J2EE's message-driven bean style, Spring provides a number of message
|
||||
Java EE's message-driven bean style, Spring provides a number of message
|
||||
listener containers that are used to create Message-Driven POJOs
|
||||
(MDPs).</para>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
|
|||
<para>When using JMS inside an EJB, the vendor provides implementations
|
||||
of the JMS interfaces so that they can participate in declarative
|
||||
transaction management and perform pooling of connections and session.
|
||||
In order to use this implementation, J2EE containers typically require
|
||||
In order to use this implementation, Java EE containers typically require
|
||||
that you declare a JMS connection factory as a
|
||||
<property>resource-ref</property> inside the EJB or servlet deployment
|
||||
descriptors. To ensure the use of these features with the
|
||||
|
|
@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
|
|||
<classname>JmsTemplate</classname> automatically detects such
|
||||
transactional resources and operates on them accordingly.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In a J2EE environment, the
|
||||
<para>In a Java EE environment, the
|
||||
<classname>ConnectionFactory</classname> will pool Connections and
|
||||
Sessions, so those resources are efficiently reused across transactions.
|
||||
In a standalone environment, using Spring's
|
||||
|
|
@ -349,7 +349,7 @@
|
|||
<classname>ConnectionFactory</classname> for performing distributed
|
||||
transactions. Note that this requires the use of a JTA transaction
|
||||
manager as well as a properly XA-configured ConnectionFactory! (Check
|
||||
your J2EE server's / JMS provider's documentation.)</para>
|
||||
your Java EE server's / JMS provider's documentation.)</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Reusing code across a managed and unmanaged transactional
|
||||
environment can be confusing when using the JMS API to create a
|
||||
|
|
@ -801,9 +801,9 @@ public interface SessionAwareMessageListener {
|
|||
<para>To configure a message listener container for XA transaction
|
||||
participation, you'll want to configure a
|
||||
<classname>JtaTransactionManager</classname> (which, by default,
|
||||
delegates to the J2EE server's transaction subsystem). Note that the
|
||||
delegates to the Java EE server's transaction subsystem). Note that the
|
||||
underlying JMS ConnectionFactory needs to be XA-capable and properly
|
||||
registered with your JTA transaction coordinator! (Check your J2EE
|
||||
registered with your JTA transaction coordinator! (Check your Java EE
|
||||
server's configuration of JNDI resources.) This allows message recepton
|
||||
as well as e.g. database access to be part of the same transaction (with
|
||||
unified commit semantics, at the expense of XA transaction log
|
||||
|
|
@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schem
|
|||
cache level will effectively be "consumer", unless an external
|
||||
transaction manager has been specified - in which case the
|
||||
effective default will be <literal>none</literal> (assuming
|
||||
J2EE-style transaction management where the given
|
||||
Java EE-style transaction management where the given
|
||||
ConnectionFactory is an XA-aware pool).</para></entry>
|
||||
</row>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
|
||||
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd">
|
||||
<chapter id="introduction">
|
||||
<title>Introduction</title>
|
||||
<chapter id="overview">
|
||||
<title>Introduction to Spring Framework</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Fundamentally, what is Spring? We think of it as a Platform for your
|
||||
Java code. It provides comprehensive infrastructural support for developing
|
||||
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
|
|||
</listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<section id="introduction-dependency-injection">
|
||||
<section id="overview-dependency-injection">
|
||||
<title>Dependency Injection</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<sidebar id="background-ioc">
|
||||
|
|
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
|
|||
applications.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section id="introduction-modules">
|
||||
<section id="overview-modules">
|
||||
<title>Modules</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>The Spring Framework contains a lot of features, which are
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ public class AccountServiceImpl implements AccountService {
|
|||
<para>Spring can work with both standard Java web services APIs. On Java
|
||||
EE 5 / Java 6, the obvious choice is JAX-WS. On J2EE 1.4 environments
|
||||
that run on Java 5, you might have the option to plug in a JAX-WS
|
||||
provider; check your J2EE server's documentation.</para>
|
||||
provider; check your Java EE server's documentation.</para>
|
||||
</note>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>In addition to stock support for JAX-RPC and JAX-WS in Spring Core,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
|
|||
<title>Unit testing</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>One of the main benefits of Dependency Injection is that your code
|
||||
should really depend far less on the container than in traditional J2EE
|
||||
should really depend far less on the container than in traditional Java EE
|
||||
development. The POJOs that make up your application should be testable in
|
||||
JUnit or TestNG tests, with objects simply instantiated using the
|
||||
<literal>new</literal> operator, <emphasis>without Spring or any other
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
|
|||
contains an implementation of the JNDI SPI, which is useful for
|
||||
setting up a simple JNDI environment for test suites or stand-alone
|
||||
applications. If, for example, JDBC <classname>DataSource</classname>s
|
||||
get bound to the same JNDI names in test code as within a J2EE
|
||||
get bound to the same JNDI names in test code as within a Java EE
|
||||
container, both application code and configuration can be reused in
|
||||
testing scenarios without modification.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ findOwnersForm.url=/WEB-INF/jsp/findOwners.jsp
|
|||
class="libraryfile">commons-collections.jar</filename> needs also to be
|
||||
available for Velocity. Typically they are included in the
|
||||
<literal>WEB-INF/lib</literal> folder where they are guaranteed to be
|
||||
found by a J2EE server and added to the classpath for your application.
|
||||
found by a Java EE server and added to the classpath for your application.
|
||||
It is of course assumed that you already have the <filename
|
||||
class="libraryfile">spring.jar</filename> in your <filename
|
||||
class="directory">'WEB-INF/lib'</filename> directory too! The latest
|
||||
|
|
@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ home.root=words</programlisting>
|
|||
|
||||
<para>You will also need to ensure that an XML parser and an XSLT engine
|
||||
are available on the classpath. JDK 1.4 provides them by default, and
|
||||
most J2EE containers will also make them available by default, but it's
|
||||
most Java EE containers will also make them available by default, but it's
|
||||
a possible source of errors to be aware of.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<para>Onto specifics... all that one need do is to declare a <ulink
|
||||
url="http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/api/org/springframework/web/context/ContextLoaderListener.html"><classname>ContextLoaderListener</classname></ulink>
|
||||
in the standard J2EE servlet <literal>web.xml</literal> file of one's web
|
||||
in the standard Java EE servlet <literal>web.xml</literal> file of one's web
|
||||
application, and add a <literal>contextConfigLocation</literal>
|
||||
<context-param/> section (in the same file) that defines which set
|
||||
of Spring XML cpnfiguration files to load.</para>
|
||||
|
|
@ -611,13 +611,13 @@
|
|||
</quote>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>While Spring has its own <link linkend="mvc">powerful web
|
||||
layer</link>, there are a number of unique advantages to building a J2EE
|
||||
layer</link>, there are a number of unique advantages to building a Java EE
|
||||
application using a combination of Tapestry for the web user interface and
|
||||
the Spring container for the lower layers. This section of the web
|
||||
integration chapter attempts to detail a few best practices for combining
|
||||
these two frameworks.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>A <emphasis>typical</emphasis> layered J2EE application built with
|
||||
<para>A <emphasis>typical</emphasis> layered Java EE application built with
|
||||
Tapestry and Spring will consist of a top user interface (UI) layer built
|
||||
with Tapestry, and a number of lower layers, all wired together by one or
|
||||
more Spring containers. Tapestry's own reference documentation contains
|
||||
|
|
@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schem
|
|||
application by calling Spring's static utility function
|
||||
<literal>WebApplicationContextUtils.getApplicationContext(servletContext)</literal>,
|
||||
where servletContext is the standard
|
||||
<interface>ServletContext</interface> from the J2EE Servlet
|
||||
<interface>ServletContext</interface> from the Java EE Servlet
|
||||
specification. As such, one simple mechanism for a page to get an
|
||||
instance of the <interfacename>UserService</interfacename>, for example,
|
||||
would be with code such as:</para>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ public abstract class Login extends BasePage implements ErrorProperty, PageRende
|
|||
are coming from, and in fact it is easy to slip in another implementation,
|
||||
for example, during testing. This inversion of control is one of the prime
|
||||
goals and benefits of the Spring Framework, and we have managed to extend
|
||||
it all the way up the J2EE stack in this Tapestry application.</para>
|
||||
it all the way up the Java EE stack in this Tapestry application.</para>
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
||||
<section id="web-integration-resources">
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue