Fix nested @Component annotation instantiation bug
3.1 M2 introduced a regression that causes false positives during @Configuration class candidate checks. Now performing a call to AnnotationMetadata#isInterface in addition to checks for @Component and @Bean annotations when determining whether a candidate is a 'lite' configuration class. Annotations are in the end interfaces, so both are filtered out at once. Issue: SPR-8761
This commit is contained in:
parent
faba5941f7
commit
68f61f3b3c
|
|
@ -100,8 +100,9 @@ abstract class ConfigurationClassUtils {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
public static boolean isLiteConfigurationCandidate(AnnotationMetadata metadata) {
|
public static boolean isLiteConfigurationCandidate(AnnotationMetadata metadata) {
|
||||||
return metadata.isAnnotated(Component.class.getName()) ||
|
return !metadata.isInterface() && // not an interface or an annotation
|
||||||
metadata.hasAnnotatedMethods(Bean.class.getName());
|
(metadata.isAnnotated(Component.class.getName()) ||
|
||||||
|
metadata.hasAnnotatedMethods(Bean.class.getName()));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Copyright 2002-2011 the original author or authors.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
||||||
|
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
||||||
|
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
||||||
|
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
||||||
|
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
||||||
|
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
||||||
|
* limitations under the License.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
package org.springframework.context.annotation.spr8761;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;
|
||||||
|
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
|
||||||
|
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||||
|
import org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigApplicationContext;
|
||||||
|
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* Tests cornering the regression reported in SPR-8761.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* @author Chris Beams
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
public class Spr8761Tests {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* Prior to the fix for SPR-8761, this test threw because the nested MyComponent
|
||||||
|
* annotation was being falsely considered as a 'lite' Configuration class candidate.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
@Test
|
||||||
|
public void repro() {
|
||||||
|
AnnotationConfigApplicationContext ctx = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext();
|
||||||
|
ctx.scan(getClass().getPackage().getName());
|
||||||
|
ctx.refresh();
|
||||||
|
assertThat(ctx.containsBean("withNestedAnnotation"), is(true));
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Component
|
||||||
|
class WithNestedAnnotation {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
|
||||||
|
@Component
|
||||||
|
public static @interface MyComponent {
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue