Merge branch '5.3.x'

This commit is contained in:
Sam Brannen 2022-02-19 17:02:02 +01:00
commit ad3095f197
5 changed files with 12 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ abstract class AnnotationsScanner {
}
@Nullable
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
private static <C, R> R processClass(C context, Class<?> source,
SearchStrategy searchStrategy, AnnotationsProcessor<C, R> processor) {
@ -229,6 +230,7 @@ abstract class AnnotationsScanner {
}
@Nullable
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
private static <C, R> R processMethod(C context, Method source,
SearchStrategy searchStrategy, AnnotationsProcessor<C, R> processor) {
@ -499,6 +501,7 @@ abstract class AnnotationsScanner {
return (type.getName().startsWith("java.") || type == Ordered.class);
}
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
private static boolean isWithoutHierarchy(AnnotatedElement source, SearchStrategy searchStrategy) {
if (source == Object.class) {
return true;

View File

@ -482,7 +482,9 @@ public interface MergedAnnotations extends Iterable<MergedAnnotation<Annotation>
* need to be meta-annotated with {@link Inherited @Inherited}. When
* searching a {@link Method} source, this strategy is identical to
* {@link #TYPE_HIERARCHY}.
* @deprecated as of Spring Framework 5.3.17; to be removed in Spring Framework 6.0
*/
@Deprecated
TYPE_HIERARCHY_AND_ENCLOSING_CLASSES
}

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright 2002-2020 the original author or authors.
* Copyright 2002-2022 the original author or authors.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ class AnnotationsScannerTests {
}
@Test
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
void typeHierarchyWithEnclosedStrategyOnEnclosedStaticClassScansAnnotations() {
Class<?> source = AnnotationEnclosingClassSample.EnclosedStatic.EnclosedStaticStatic.class;
assertThat(scan(source, SearchStrategy.TYPE_HIERARCHY_AND_ENCLOSING_CLASSES))
@ -428,6 +429,7 @@ class AnnotationsScannerTests {
}
@Test
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
void typeHierarchyWithEnclosedStrategyOnEnclosedInnerClassScansAnnotations() {
Class<?> source = AnnotationEnclosingClassSample.EnclosedInner.EnclosedInnerInner.class;
assertThat(scan(source, SearchStrategy.TYPE_HIERARCHY_AND_ENCLOSING_CLASSES))
@ -435,6 +437,7 @@ class AnnotationsScannerTests {
}
@Test
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
void typeHierarchyWithEnclosedStrategyOnMethodHierarchyUsesTypeHierarchyScan() {
Method source = methodFrom(WithHierarchy.class);
assertThat(scan(source, SearchStrategy.TYPE_HIERARCHY_AND_ENCLOSING_CLASSES)).containsExactly(

View File

@ -711,6 +711,7 @@ class MergedAnnotationsTests {
}
@Test
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
void streamTypeHierarchyAndEnclosingClassesFromNonAnnotatedInnerClassWithAnnotatedEnclosingClass() {
Stream<Class<?>> classes = MergedAnnotations.from(AnnotatedClass.NonAnnotatedInnerClass.class,
SearchStrategy.TYPE_HIERARCHY_AND_ENCLOSING_CLASSES).stream().map(MergedAnnotation::getType);
@ -718,6 +719,7 @@ class MergedAnnotationsTests {
}
@Test
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
void streamTypeHierarchyAndEnclosingClassesFromNonAnnotatedStaticNestedClassWithAnnotatedEnclosingClass() {
Stream<Class<?>> classes = MergedAnnotations.from(AnnotatedClass.NonAnnotatedStaticNestedClass.class,
SearchStrategy.TYPE_HIERARCHY_AND_ENCLOSING_CLASSES).stream().map(MergedAnnotation::getType);

View File

@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ public enum SpelMessage {
FLAWED_PATTERN(Kind.ERROR, 1073,
"Failed to efficiently evaluate pattern ''{0}'': consider redesigning it"),
/** @since 5.3.16 */
/** @since 5.3.17 */
EXCEPTION_COMPILING_EXPRESSION(Kind.ERROR, 1074,
"An exception occurred while compiling an expression");