added documentation for the task namespace

This commit is contained in:
Mark Fisher 2009-09-06 18:24:16 +00:00
parent bfa4231c9d
commit b18a1dc5b3
1 changed files with 133 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -383,6 +383,139 @@ public class TaskExecutorExample {
as scheduled, and potentially recurring, executions.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace">
<title>The Task Namespace</title>
<para>Beginning with Spring 3.0, there is an XML namespace for configuring
<interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> and
<interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename> instances. It also provides a
convenient way to configure tasks to be scheduled with a trigger.</para>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace-scheduler">
<title>The 'scheduler' element</title>
<para>The following element will create a
<classname>ThreadPoolTaskScheduler</classname> instance with the
specified thread pool size.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:scheduler id="scheduler" size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
<para>The value provided for the "id" attribute will be used as the
prefix for thread names within the pool. The 'scheduler' element is
relatively straightforward. If you do not provide a 'size' attribute,
the default thread pool will only have a single thread. There are no
other configuration options for the scheduler.</para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace-executor">
<title>The 'executor' element</title>
<para>The following will create a
<classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname> instance:
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:executor id="executor" size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
</para>
<para>As with the scheduler above, the value provided for the "id"
attribute will be used as the prefix for thread names within the pool.
As far as the pool size is concerned, the 'executor' element supports
more configuration options than the 'scheduler' element. For one thing,
the thread pool for a <classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname> is
itself more configurable. Rather than just a single size, an executor's
thread pool may have different values for the <emphasis>core</emphasis>
and the <emphasis>max</emphasis> size. If a single value is provided
then the executor will have a fixed-size thread pool (the core and max
sizes are the same). However, the 'executor' element's 'size' attribute
also accepts a range in the form of "m-n".
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:executor id="executorWithPoolSizeRange"
size="5-25"
queue-capacity="100"/>]]></programlisting>
</para>
<para>As you can see from that configuration, a 'queue-capacity' value
has also been provided. The configuration of the thread pool should
also be considered in light of the executor's queue capacity. For the
full description of the relationship between pool size and queue
capacity, consult the documentation for
<ulink url="http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.html">ThreadPoolExecutor</ulink>.
The main idea is that when a task is submitted, the executor will first
try to use a free thread if the number of active threads is currently
less than the core size. If the core size has been reached, then the
task will be added to the queue as long as its capacity has not yet
been reached. Only then, if the queue's capacity
<emphasis>has</emphasis> been reached, will the executor create a new
thread beyond the core size. If the max size has also been reached,
then the executor will reject the task.</para>
<para>By default, the queue is <emphasis>unbounded</emphasis>, but this
is rarely the desired configuration, because it can lead to
<classname>OutOfMemoryErrors</classname> if enough tasks are added to
that queue while all pool threads are busy. Furthermore, if the queue
is unbounded, then the max size has no effect at all. Since the
executor will always try the queue before creating a new thread beyond
the core size, a queue must have a finite capacity for the thread pool
to grow beyond the core size (this is why a "fixed-size" pool is the
only sensible case when using an unbounded queue).</para>
<para>In a moment, we will review the effects of the keep-alive setting
which adds yet another factor to consider when providing a pool size
configuration. First, let's consider the case, as mentioned above, when
a task is rejected. By default, when a task is rejected, a thread pool
executor will throw a <classname>TaskRejectedException</classname>.
However, the rejection policy is actually configurable. The exception
is thrown when using the default rejection policy which is the
<classname>AbortPolicy</classname> implementation. For applications
where some tasks can be skipped under heavy load, either the
<classname>DiscardPolicy</classname> or
<classname>DiscardOldestPolicy</classname> may be configured instead.
Another option that works well for applications that need to throttle
the submitted tasks under heavy load is the
<classname>CallerRunsPolicy</classname>. Instead of throwing an
exception or discarding tasks, that policy will simply force the thread
that is calling the submit method to run the task itself. The idea is
that such a caller will be busy while running that task and not able to
submit other tasks immediately. Therefore it provides a simple way to
throttle the incoming load while maintaining the limits of the thread
pool and queue. Typically this allows the executor to "catch up" on the
tasks it is handling and thereby frees up some capacity on the queue,
in the pool, or both. Any of these options can be chosen from an
enumeration of values available for the 'rejection-policy' attribute on
the 'executor' element.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:executor id="executorWithCallerRunsPolicy"
size="5-25"
queue-capacity="100"
rejection-policy="CALLER_RUNS"/>]]></programlisting>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace-scheduled-tasks">
<title>The 'scheduled-tasks' element</title>
<para>The most powerful feature of Spring's task namespace is the
support for configuring tasks to be scheduled within a Spring
Application Context. This follows an approach similar to other
"method-invokers" in Spring, such as that provided by the JMS namespace
for configuring Message-driven POJOs. Basically a "ref" attribute can
point to any Spring-managed object, and the "method" attribute provides
the name of a method to be invoked on that object. Here is a simple
example.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:scheduled-tasks scheduler="myScheduler">
<task:scheduled ref="someObject" method="someMethod" fixed-delay="5000"/>
<task:scheduled-tasks/>
<task:scheduler id="myScheduler" size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
<para>As you can see, the scheduler is referenced by the outer element,
and each individual task includes the configuration of its trigger
metadata. In the preceding example, that metadata defines a periodic
trigger with a fixed delay. It could also be configured with a
"fixed-rate", or for more control, a "cron" attribute could be provided
instead. Here's an example featuring these other options.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:scheduled-tasks scheduler="myScheduler">
<task:scheduled ref="someObject" method="someMethod" fixed-rate="5000"/>
<task:scheduled ref="anotherObject" method="anotherMethod" cron="*/5 * * * * MON-FRI"/>
<task:scheduled-tasks/>
<task:scheduler id="myScheduler" size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
</section>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-quartz">
<title>Using the OpenSymphony Quartz Scheduler</title>
<para>Quartz uses <classname>Trigger</classname>, <classname>Job</classname> and