Remove obsolete PetClinic Example section of Testing chapter
Issue: #22288
This commit is contained in:
parent
810b615471
commit
edadb9efb6
|
|
@ -195,7 +195,6 @@ applications. It includes the following topics:
|
|||
* <<integration-testing-annotations>>
|
||||
* <<testcontext-framework>>
|
||||
* <<spring-mvc-test-framework>>
|
||||
* <<testing-examples-petclinic>>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -3708,8 +3707,7 @@ a Hibernate-based `UserRepository`:
|
|||
|
||||
As explained in <<testcontext-tx-rollback-and-commit-behavior>>, there is no need to
|
||||
clean up the database after the `createUser()` method runs, since any changes made to the
|
||||
database are automatically rolled back by the `TransactionalTestExecutionListener`. See
|
||||
<<testing-examples-petclinic>> for an additional example.
|
||||
database are automatically rolled back by the `TransactionalTestExecutionListener`.
|
||||
|
||||
[[testcontext-tx-rollback-and-commit-behavior]]
|
||||
===== Transaction Rollback and Commit Behavior
|
||||
|
|
@ -6136,113 +6134,6 @@ include::testing-webtestclient.adoc[leveloffset=+2]
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[testing-examples-petclinic]]
|
||||
=== PetClinic Example
|
||||
|
||||
The PetClinic application, available on
|
||||
https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-petclinic[GitHub], shows several features of
|
||||
the Spring TestContext Framework in a JUnit 4 environment. Most test functionality is
|
||||
included in the `AbstractClinicTests`, for which a partial listing follows:
|
||||
|
||||
====
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0]
|
||||
[subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
|
||||
// import ...
|
||||
|
||||
@ContextConfiguration <1>
|
||||
public abstract class AbstractClinicTests extends AbstractTransactionalJUnit4SpringContextTests { <2>
|
||||
|
||||
@Autowired <3>
|
||||
protected Clinic clinic;
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void getVets() {
|
||||
Collection<Vet> vets = this.clinic.getVets();
|
||||
assertEquals("JDBC query must show the same number of vets",
|
||||
super.countRowsInTable("VETS"), vets.size()); <4>
|
||||
Vet v1 = EntityUtils.getById(vets, Vet.class, 2);
|
||||
assertEquals("Leary", v1.getLastName());
|
||||
assertEquals(1, v1.getNrOfSpecialties());
|
||||
assertEquals("radiology", (v1.getSpecialties().get(0)).getName());
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
<1> Load the application context from the default location: `AbstractClinicTests-context.xml`.
|
||||
<2> This test case extends the `AbstractTransactionalJUnit4SpringContextTests` class, from
|
||||
which it inherits configuration for Dependency Injection (through the
|
||||
`DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener`) and transactional behavior (through the
|
||||
`TransactionalTestExecutionListener`).
|
||||
<3> The `clinic` instance variable (the application object being tested) is set by
|
||||
Dependency Injection through `@Autowired` semantics.
|
||||
<4> The `getVets()` method shows how you can use the inherited `countRowsInTable()`
|
||||
method to easily verify the number of rows in a given table, thus verifying correct
|
||||
behavior of the application code being tested. This allows for stronger tests and
|
||||
lessens dependency on the exact test data. For example, you can add additional rows in
|
||||
the database without breaking tests.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
Like many integration tests that use a database, most of the tests in
|
||||
`AbstractClinicTests` depend on a minimum amount of data already being in the database
|
||||
before the test cases run. Alternatively, you can populate the database within the test
|
||||
fixture set up of your test cases (again, within the same transaction as the tests).
|
||||
|
||||
The PetClinic application supports three data access technologies: JDBC, Hibernate, and
|
||||
JPA. By declaring `@ContextConfiguration` without any specific resource locations, the
|
||||
`AbstractClinicTests` class has its application context loaded from the default location,
|
||||
`AbstractClinicTests-context.xml`, which declares a common `DataSource`. Subclasses
|
||||
specify additional context locations that must declare a `PlatformTransactionManager` and
|
||||
a concrete implementation of `Clinic`.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, the Hibernate implementation of the PetClinic tests contains the following
|
||||
implementation. For this example, `HibernateClinicTests` does not contain a single line
|
||||
of code. We need only to declare `@ContextConfiguration`, and the tests are inherited
|
||||
from `AbstractClinicTests`. Because `@ContextConfiguration` is declared without any
|
||||
specific resource locations, the Spring TestContext Framework loads an application
|
||||
context from all the beans defined in `AbstractClinicTests-context.xml` (that is, the
|
||||
inherited locations) and `HibernateClinicTests-context.xml`, with
|
||||
`HibernateClinicTests-context.xml` possibly overriding beans defined in
|
||||
`AbstractClinicTests-context.xml`. The following listing shows the definition of the
|
||||
`HibernateClinicTests` class:
|
||||
|
||||
====
|
||||
[source,java,indent=0]
|
||||
[subs="verbatim,quotes"]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@ContextConfiguration <1>
|
||||
public class HibernateClinicTests extends AbstractClinicTests { }
|
||||
----
|
||||
<1> Load the application context from `AbstractClinicTests-context.xml` and `HibernateClinicTests-context.xml`.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
In a large-scale application, the Spring configuration is often split across multiple
|
||||
files. Consequently, configuration locations are typically specified in a common base
|
||||
class for all application-specific integration tests. Such a base class can also add
|
||||
useful instance variables (populated by Dependency Injection, naturally), such as a
|
||||
`SessionFactory` in the case of an application that uses Hibernate.
|
||||
|
||||
As far as possible, you should have exactly the same Spring configuration files in your
|
||||
integration tests as in the deployed environment. One likely point of difference concerns
|
||||
database connection pooling and transaction infrastructure. If you are deploying to a
|
||||
full-blown application server, you probably use its connection pool (available through
|
||||
JNDI) and JTA implementation. Thus, in production, you can use a `JndiObjectFactoryBean`
|
||||
or `<jee:jndi-lookup>` for the `DataSource` and `JtaTransactionManager`. JNDI and JTA are
|
||||
not available in out-of-container integration tests, so you should use a combination such
|
||||
as the Commons DBCP `BasicDataSource` and `DataSourceTransactionManager` or
|
||||
`HibernateTransactionManager` for them. You can factor out this variant behavior into a
|
||||
single XML file, having the choice between application server and a "`local`"
|
||||
configuration separated from all other configuration, which will not vary between the
|
||||
test and production environments. In addition, we recommend that you use properties files
|
||||
for connection settings. See the PetClinic application for an example.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[testing-resources]]
|
||||
== Further Resources
|
||||
See the following resources for more information about testing:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue