Prior to this commit, @ModelAttribute(binding=false) was honored with
Spring Web MVC but not with WebFlux.
This commit adds support for disabling binding via @ModelAttribute with
WebFlux by adding a check to resolveArgument(...) in
ModelAttributeMethodArgumentResolver.
Closes gh-26856
Prior to this commit, evaluating validation hints for
@javax.validation.Valid caused exceptions being raised when getting the
value of this annotation, which does not exist. Bypassing
AnnotationUtils.getValue() in those cases can improve performance by
avoiding the cost incurred by raising exceptions.
See gh-26787
This commit introduces support in both servlet and webflux for the
"Accept-Patch" header, which is sent when the client sends unsupported
data in PATCH requests.
See section 2.2 of RFC 5789.
Closes gh-26759
This commit introduces support in both servlet and webflux for the
"Accept-Patch" header in OPTIONS requests, as defined in section 3.1 of
RFC 5789.
See gh-26759
Prior to this commit, a method-level @CrossOrigin maxAge value did not
override a class-level @CrossOrigin maxAge value. This contradicts the
Javadoc for @CrossOrgin which states the following.
For those attributes where only a single value can be accepted such
as allowCredentials and maxAge, the local overrides the global
value.
This commit ensures that a method-level @CrossOrigin maxAge value
overrides a class-level @CrossOrigin maxAge value.
Closes gh-26619
Prior to this commit, `ResourceUrlProvider` would listen and consider
all `ContextRefreshedEvent` and use the given context to detect
`SimpleUrlHandlerMapping`.
This could lead to situations where a `ResourceUrlProvider` uses another
application context than its own (in a parent/child context setup) and
detect the wrong set of handlers.
Because `ResourceUrlProvider` locks itself once the auto-detection is
done, we need to ensure that it considers only events sent by its
application context.
Fixes gh-26561
1. Update the HandlerMapping contract to state that CORS checks are expected
to be applied before returning a handler.
2. DispatcherHandler checks explicitly for pre-flight requests or CORS failed
requests and skips handling for both. Technically no change since
AbstractHandlerMapping already returns a NO_OP_HANDLER for those cases.
The purpose however is for the DispatcherHandler to also guarantee more
explicitly that no such handling can take place for such cases.
As one consequence, this makes it possible to invoke the DispatcherHandler from
anywhere in the WebFilter chain in order to "handle" a pre-flight request, and
then skip the rest of the WebFilter chain.
See gh-26257
The alternative is to use a filter but this makes it a little easier
and also guarantees that it will be downstream from all filters
regardless of their order, and therefore the Context will be visible
to all of them.
Closes gh-25710
This commit makes copies of the default headers and cookies when a
WebClient is built, so that subsequent changes to these do not affect
previously built clients.
Closes: gh-25992
Allow the body to be written in order for all headers to be set
as they would be on HTTP GET. The body content is ignored as a
lower level.
See gh-25976
The migration from JUnit 4 assertions to AssertJ assertions resulted in
several unnecessary casts from int to long that actually cause
assertions to pass when they should otherwise fail.
This commit fixes all such bugs for the pattern `.isNotEqualTo((long)`.
This commit raises the minimum Coroutines version supported
to 1.4.0-M1 and above, and changes usages of awaitFirst() or
awaitFirstOrNull() to awaitSingle() or awaitSingleOrNull()
to fix gh-25007.
Closes gh-25914
Closes gh-25007
This commit adds support for Kotlin Coroutines suspending functions to
Spring MVC, by converting those to a Mono that can then be handled by
the asynchronous request processing feature.
It also optimizes Coroutines detection with the introduction of an
optimized KotlinDetector.isSuspendingFunction() method that does not
require kotlin-reflect.
Closes gh-23611
Prior to this commit, the resource handler serving static resources for
Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux would always look at the
`Resource#lastModified` information, derive the `"Last-Modified"` HTTP
response header and support HTTP conditional requests with that
information.
In some cases, builds or packaging tools choose to set this last
modification date to a static date in the past. This allows tools to
have reproducible builds or to leverage caching given the static
resources content didn't change.
This can lead to problems where this static date (e.g. "1980-01-01") is
used literally in HTTP responses and will make the HTTP caching
mechanism counter-productive: the content of the resources changed, but
the application insists on saying it didn't change since the 80s...
This commit adds a new configuration option to disable this support -
there is no way to automatically discard those dates: there is no
standard for that and many don't use he "EPOCH 0 date" as it can lead to
compatibility issues with different OSes.
Closes gh-25845
Prior to this commit, error handlers in the WebMvc.fn and WebFlux.fn
router function builders had to be registered in an unintuitive, reverse
order, due to the filter chain composition model used.
This commit reverses the error handler order, so that more specific
error handlers can come before generic ones.
Closes gh-25541
This commit adds two overloaded methods for each HTTP method in the
WebFlux.fn and WebMvc.fn route builders: one method taking just a
handler function, the other a request predicate and handler function.
After this commit, it is no longer required to provide a String path,
which is particularly useful when nesting routes, and the path would be
"".
Closes gh-25752
The exchange() method is now deprecated because it is not safe for
general use but that doesn't apply to the WebTestClient because it
exposes a different higher level API for response handling that
ensures the response is consumed. Nevertheless WebTestClient cannot
call WebClient.exchange() any more.
To fix this WebTestClient no longer delegates to WebClient and thus
gains direct access to the underlying ExchangeFunction. This is
not a big deal because WebClient and WebTestClient do the same
only when it comes to gathering builder options and request input.
See gh-25751