spring-framework/spring-framework-reference/src/scheduling.xml

862 lines
40 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.4//EN"
"http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.4/docbookx.dtd">
<chapter id="scheduling">
<title>Task Execution and Scheduling</title>
<section id="scheduling-introduction">
<title>Introduction</title>
<para>
The Spring Framework provides abstractions for asynchronous execution and scheduling of tasks
with the <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> and <interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename>
interfaces, respectively. Spring also features implementations of those interfaces that support
thread pools or delegation to CommonJ within an application server environment. Ultimately
the use of these implementations behind the common interfaces abstracts away the differences
between Java SE 5, Java SE 6 and Java EE environments.
</para>
<para>
Spring also features integration classes for supporting scheduling with the
<classname>Timer</classname>, part of the JDK since 1.3, and the Quartz Scheduler
(<ulink url="http://www.opensymphony.com/quartz/"/>). Both of those schedulers
are set up using a <interfacename>FactoryBean</interfacename> with optional references
to <classname>Timer</classname> or <classname>Trigger</classname> instances, respectively.
Furthermore, a convenience class for both the Quartz Scheduler and the <classname>Timer</classname> is
available that allows you to invoke a method of an existing target object
(analogous to the normal <classname>MethodInvokingFactoryBean</classname> operation).
</para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-executor">
<title>The Spring <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> abstraction</title>
<para>Spring 2.0 introduces a new abstraction for dealing with
executors. Executors are the Java 5 name for the concept of
thread pools. The "executor" naming is due to the fact that there
is no guarantee that the underlying implementation is actually a
pool; an executor may be single-threaded or even synchronous.
Spring's abstraction hides implementation details between
Java SE 1.4, Java SE 5 and Java EE environments.</para>
<para>Spring's <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> interface is
identical to the <classname>java.util.concurrent.Executor</classname>
interface. In fact, its primary reason for existence is to abstract away
the need for Java 5 when using thread pools. The interface has a single
method <classname>execute(Runnable task)</classname> that accepts a task
for execution based on the semantics and configuration of the thread pool.</para>
<para>The <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> was originally
created to give other Spring components an abstraction for thread pooling where
needed. Components such as the <classname>ApplicationEventMulticaster</classname>,
JMS's <classname>AbstractMessageListenerContainer</classname>,
and Quartz integration all use the <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename>
abstraction to pool threads. However, if your beans need thread pooling behavior,
it is possible to use this abstraction for your own needs.</para>
<section id="scheduling-task-executor-types">
<title><interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> types</title>
<para>There are a number of pre-built implementations of
<interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> included with the
Spring distribution. In all likelihood, you shouldn't ever
need to implement your own.</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
<classname>SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor</classname>
</para>
<para>
This implementation does not reuse any threads,
rather it starts up a new thread for each
invocation. However, it does support a
concurrency limit which will block any
invocations that are over the limit until a slot
has been freed up. If you're looking for true
pooling, keep scrolling further down the page.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem id="syncTaskExecutor">
<para>
<classname>SyncTaskExecutor</classname>
</para>
<para>
This implementation doesn't execute
invocations asynchronously. Instead, each
invocation takes place in the calling thread. It
is primarily used in situations where
multithreading isn't necessary such as simple
test cases.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem id="concurrentTaskExecutor">
<para>
<classname>ConcurrentTaskExecutor</classname>
</para>
<para>
This implementation is a wrapper for a Java 5
<classname>java.util.concurrent.Executor</classname>.
There is an alternative,
<classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname>,
that exposes the <classname>Executor</classname>
configuration parameters as bean properties. It
is rare to need to use the <classname>ConcurrentTaskExecutor</classname>
but if the
<link linkend="threadPoolTaskExecutor"><classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname></link>
isn't robust enough for your needs, the
<classname>ConcurrentTaskExecutor</classname>
is an alternative.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem id="simpleThreadPoolTaskExecutor">
<para>
<classname>SimpleThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname>
</para>
<para>
This implementation is actually a subclass of
Quartz's <classname>SimpleThreadPool</classname>
which listens to Spring's lifecycle callbacks.
This is typically used when you have a
thread pool that may need to be shared by both
Quartz and non-Quartz components.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem id="threadPoolTaskExecutor">
<para>
<classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname>
</para>
<sidebar>
<para>
It is not possible to use any backport or
alternate versions of the
<classname>java.util.concurrent</classname>
package with this implementation. Both Doug
Lea's and Dawid Kurzyniec's implementations
use different package structures which will
prevent them from working correctly.
</para>
</sidebar>
<para>
This implementation can only be used in a Java 5
environment but is also the most commonly used
one in that environment. It exposes bean properties for
configuring a
<classname>java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor</classname>
and wraps it in a <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename>.
If you need something advanced such as a
<classname>ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor</classname>,
it is recommended that you use a
<link linkend="concurrentTaskExecutor"><classname>ConcurrentTaskExecutor</classname></link>
instead.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<classname>TimerTaskExecutor</classname>
</para>
<para>
This implementation uses a single
<classname>TimerTask</classname>
as its backing implementation. It's different
from the
<link linkend="syncTaskExecutor"><classname>SyncTaskExecutor</classname></link>
in that the method invocations are executed in a
separate thread, although they are synchronous
in that thread.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<classname>WorkManagerTaskExecutor</classname>
</para>
<sidebar><para>
CommonJ is a set of specifications jointly
developed between BEA and IBM. These
specifications are not Java EE standards, but
are standard across BEA's and IBM's
Application Server implementations.
</para></sidebar>
<para>
This implementation uses the CommonJ WorkManager
as its backing implementation and is the central
convenience class for setting up a CommonJ
WorkManager reference in a Spring context.
Similar to the
<link linkend="simpleThreadPoolTaskExecutor"><classname>SimpleThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname></link>,
this class implements the WorkManager
interface and therefore can be used directly as
a WorkManager as well.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-executor-usage">
<title>Using a <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename></title>
<para>Spring's <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> implementations
are used as simple JavaBeans. In the example below, we define
a bean that uses the <classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname>
to asynchronously print out a set of messages.</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[import org.springframework.core.task.TaskExecutor;
public class TaskExecutorExample {
private class MessagePrinterTask implements Runnable {
private String message;
public MessagePrinterTask(String message) {
this.message = message;
}
public void run() {
System.out.println(message);
}
}
private TaskExecutor taskExecutor;
public TaskExecutorExample(TaskExecutor taskExecutor) {
this.taskExecutor = taskExecutor;
}
public void printMessages() {
for(int i = 0; i < 25; i++) {
taskExecutor.execute(new MessagePrinterTask("Message" + i));
}
}
}]]></programlisting>
<para>As you can see, rather than retrieving a thread from the
pool and executing yourself, you add your <classname>Runnable</classname>
to the queue and the <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename>
uses its internal rules to decide when the task gets executed.</para>
<para>To configure the rules that the <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename>
will use, simple bean properties have been exposed.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<bean id="taskExecutor" class="org.springframework.scheduling.concurrent.ThreadPoolTaskExecutor">
<property name="corePoolSize" value="5" />
<property name="maxPoolSize" value="10" />
<property name="queueCapacity" value="25" />
</bean>
<bean id="taskExecutorExample" class="TaskExecutorExample">
<constructor-arg ref="taskExecutor" />
</bean>]]></programlisting>
</section>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-scheduler">
<title>The Spring <interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename> abstraction</title>
<para>In addition to the <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename>
abstraction, Spring 3.0 introduces a <interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename>
with a variety of methods for scheduling tasks to run at some point in the future.
</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[public interface TaskScheduler {
ScheduledFuture schedule(Runnable task, Trigger trigger);
ScheduledFuture schedule(Runnable task, Date startTime);
ScheduledFuture scheduleAtFixedRate(Runnable task, Date startTime, long period);
ScheduledFuture scheduleAtFixedRate(Runnable task, long period);
ScheduledFuture scheduleWithFixedDelay(Runnable task, Date startTime, long delay);
ScheduledFuture scheduleWithFixedDelay(Runnable task, long delay);
}]]></programlisting>
<para>The simplest method is the one named 'schedule' that takes a
<interfacename>Runnable</interfacename> and <classname>Date</classname>
only. That will cause the task to run once after the specified time. All of
the other methods are capable of scheduling tasks to run repeatedly. The
fixed-rate and fixed-delay methods are for simple, periodic execution, but
the method that accepts a Trigger is much more flexible.</para>
<section id="scheduling-trigger-interface">
<title>The <interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> interface</title>
<para>The <interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> interface is
essentially inspired by JSR-236, which, as of Spring 3.0, has not yet
been officially implemented. The basic idea of the
<interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> is that execution times may be
determined based on past execution outcomes or even arbitrary
conditions. If these determinations do take into account the outcome of
the preceding execution, that information is available within a
<interfacename>TriggerContext</interfacename>. The
<interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> interface itself is quite
simple:</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[public interface Trigger {
Date nextExecutionTime(TriggerContext triggerContext);
}]]></programlisting>
<para>As you can see, the <interfacename>TriggerContext</interfacename>
is the most important part. It encapsulates all of the relevant data,
and is open for extension in the future if necessary. The
<interfacename>TriggerContext</interfacename> is an interface (a
<classname>SimpleTriggerContext</classname> implementation is used by
default). Here you can see what methods are available for
<interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> implementations.</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[public interface TriggerContext {
Date lastScheduledExecutionTime();
Date lastActualExecutionTime();
Date lastCompletionTime();
}]]></programlisting>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-trigger-implementations">
<title><interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> implementations</title>
<para>Spring provides two implementations of the
<interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> interface. The most interesting
one is the <classname>CronTrigger</classname>. It enables the
scheduling of tasks based on cron expressions. For example the
following task is being scheduled to run 15 minutes past each hour but
only during the 9-to-5 "business hours" on weekdays.</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[scheduler.schedule(task, new CronTrigger("* 15 9-17 * * MON-FRI"));]]></programlisting>
<para>The other out-of-the-box implementation is a
<classname>PeriodicTrigger</classname> that accepts a fixed period, an
optional initial delay value, and a boolean to indicate whether the
period should be interpreted as a fixed-rate or a fixed-delay. Since
the <interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename> interface already
defines methods for scheduling tasks at a fixed-rate or with a
fixed-delay, those methods should be used directly whenever possible.
The value of the <classname>PeriodicTrigger</classname> implementation
is that it can be used within components that rely on the
<interfacename>Trigger</interfacename> abstraction. For example, it may
be convenient to allow periodic triggers, cron-based triggers, and even
custom trigger implementations to be used interchangeably. Such a
component could take advantage of dependency injection so that such
<interfacename>Triggers</interfacename> could be configured externally.
</para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-scheduler-implementations">
<title><interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename> implementations</title>
<para>As with Spring's <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename>
abstraction, the primary benefit of the
<interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename> is that code relying on
scheduling behavior need not be coupled to a particular scheduler
implementation. The flexibility this provides is particularly relevant
when running within Application Server environments where threads
should not be created directly by the application itself. For such
cases, Spring provides a
<classname>TimerManagerTaskScheduler</classname> that delegates to a
CommonJ TimerManager instance, typically configured with a JNDI-lookup.
</para>
<para>A simpler alternative, the
<classname>ThreadPoolTaskScheduler</classname>, can be used whenever
external thread management is not a requirement. Internally, it
delegates to a <interfacename>ScheduledExecutorService</interfacename>
instance. <classname>ThreadPoolTaskScheduler</classname> actually
implements Spring's <interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename>
interface as well, so that a single instance can be used for
asynchronous execution <emphasis>as soon as possible</emphasis> as well
as scheduled, and potentially recurring, executions.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace">
<title>The Task Namespace</title>
<para>Beginning with Spring 3.0, there is an XML namespace for configuring
<interfacename>TaskExecutor</interfacename> and
<interfacename>TaskScheduler</interfacename> instances. It also provides a
convenient way to configure tasks to be scheduled with a trigger.</para>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace-scheduler">
<title>The 'scheduler' element</title>
<para>The following element will create a
<classname>ThreadPoolTaskScheduler</classname> instance with the
specified thread pool size.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:scheduler id="scheduler" pool-size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
<para>The value provided for the 'id' attribute will be used as the
prefix for thread names within the pool. The 'scheduler' element is
relatively straightforward. If you do not provide a 'pool-size' attribute,
the default thread pool will only have a single thread. There are no
other configuration options for the scheduler.</para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace-executor">
<title>The 'executor' element</title>
<para>The following will create a
<classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname> instance:
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:executor id="executor" pool-size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
</para>
<para>As with the scheduler above, the value provided for the 'id'
attribute will be used as the prefix for thread names within the pool.
As far as the pool size is concerned, the 'executor' element supports
more configuration options than the 'scheduler' element. For one thing,
the thread pool for a <classname>ThreadPoolTaskExecutor</classname> is
itself more configurable. Rather than just a single size, an executor's
thread pool may have different values for the <emphasis>core</emphasis>
and the <emphasis>max</emphasis> size. If a single value is provided
then the executor will have a fixed-size thread pool (the core and max
sizes are the same). However, the 'executor' element's 'pool-size' attribute
also accepts a range in the form of "min-max".
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:executor id="executorWithPoolSizeRange"
pool-size="5-25"
queue-capacity="100"/>]]></programlisting>
</para>
<para>As you can see from that configuration, a 'queue-capacity' value
has also been provided. The configuration of the thread pool should
also be considered in light of the executor's queue capacity. For the
full description of the relationship between pool size and queue
capacity, consult the documentation for
<ulink url="http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.html">ThreadPoolExecutor</ulink>.
The main idea is that when a task is submitted, the executor will first
try to use a free thread if the number of active threads is currently
less than the core size. If the core size has been reached, then the
task will be added to the queue as long as its capacity has not yet
been reached. Only then, if the queue's capacity
<emphasis>has</emphasis> been reached, will the executor create a new
thread beyond the core size. If the max size has also been reached,
then the executor will reject the task.</para>
<para>By default, the queue is <emphasis>unbounded</emphasis>, but this
is rarely the desired configuration, because it can lead to
<classname>OutOfMemoryErrors</classname> if enough tasks are added to
that queue while all pool threads are busy. Furthermore, if the queue
is unbounded, then the max size has no effect at all. Since the
executor will always try the queue before creating a new thread beyond
the core size, a queue must have a finite capacity for the thread pool
to grow beyond the core size (this is why a <emphasis>fixed size</emphasis>
pool is the only sensible case when using an unbounded queue).</para>
<para>In a moment, we will review the effects of the keep-alive setting
which adds yet another factor to consider when providing a pool size
configuration. First, let's consider the case, as mentioned above, when
a task is rejected. By default, when a task is rejected, a thread pool
executor will throw a <classname>TaskRejectedException</classname>.
However, the rejection policy is actually configurable. The exception
is thrown when using the default rejection policy which is the
<classname>AbortPolicy</classname> implementation. For applications
where some tasks can be skipped under heavy load, either the
<classname>DiscardPolicy</classname> or
<classname>DiscardOldestPolicy</classname> may be configured instead.
Another option that works well for applications that need to throttle
the submitted tasks under heavy load is the
<classname>CallerRunsPolicy</classname>. Instead of throwing an
exception or discarding tasks, that policy will simply force the thread
that is calling the submit method to run the task itself. The idea is
that such a caller will be busy while running that task and not able to
submit other tasks immediately. Therefore it provides a simple way to
throttle the incoming load while maintaining the limits of the thread
pool and queue. Typically this allows the executor to "catch up" on the
tasks it is handling and thereby frees up some capacity on the queue,
in the pool, or both. Any of these options can be chosen from an
enumeration of values available for the 'rejection-policy' attribute on
the 'executor' element.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:executor id="executorWithCallerRunsPolicy"
pool-size="5-25"
queue-capacity="100"
rejection-policy="CALLER_RUNS"/>]]></programlisting>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-task-namespace-scheduled-tasks">
<title>The 'scheduled-tasks' element</title>
<para>The most powerful feature of Spring's task namespace is the
support for configuring tasks to be scheduled within a Spring
Application Context. This follows an approach similar to other
"method-invokers" in Spring, such as that provided by the JMS namespace
for configuring Message-driven POJOs. Basically a "ref" attribute can
point to any Spring-managed object, and the "method" attribute provides
the name of a method to be invoked on that object. Here is a simple
example.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:scheduled-tasks scheduler="myScheduler">
<task:scheduled ref="someObject" method="someMethod" fixed-delay="5000"/>
<task:scheduled-tasks/>
<task:scheduler id="myScheduler" pool-size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
<para>As you can see, the scheduler is referenced by the outer element,
and each individual task includes the configuration of its trigger
metadata. In the preceding example, that metadata defines a periodic
trigger with a fixed delay. It could also be configured with a
"fixed-rate", or for more control, a "cron" attribute could be provided
instead. Here's an example featuring these other options.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:scheduled-tasks scheduler="myScheduler">
<task:scheduled ref="someObject" method="someMethod" fixed-rate="5000"/>
<task:scheduled ref="anotherObject" method="anotherMethod" cron="*/5 * * * * MON-FRI"/>
<task:scheduled-tasks/>
<task:scheduler id="myScheduler" pool-size="10"/>]]></programlisting>
</section>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-annotation-support">
<title>Annotation Support for Scheduling and Asynchronous Execution</title>
<para>Spring 3.0 also adds annotation support for both task scheduling
and asynchronous method execution.</para>
<section id="scheduling-annotation-support-scheduled">
<title>The @Scheduled Annotation</title>
<para>The @Scheduled annotation can be added to a method along with
trigger metadata. For example, the following method would be invoked
every 5 seconds with a fixed delay, meaning that the period will be
measured from the completion time of each preceding invocation.</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[@Scheduled(fixedDelay=5000)
public void doSomething() {
// something that should execute periodically
}]]></programlisting>
<para>If a fixed rate execution is desired, simply change the property
name specified within the annotation. The following would be executed
every 5 seconds measured between the successive start times of each
invocation.</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[@Scheduled(fixedRate=5000)
public void doSomething() {
// something that should execute periodically
}]]></programlisting>
<para>If simple periodic scheduling is not expressive enough, then a
cron expression may be provided. For example, the following will only
execute on weekdays.</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[@Scheduled(cron="*/5 * * * * MON-FRI")
public void doSomething() {
// something that should execute on weekdays only
}]]></programlisting>
<para>Notice that the methods to be scheduled must have void returns
and must not expect any arguments. If the method needs to interact with
other objects from the Application Context, then those would typically
have been provided through dependency injection.</para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-annotation-support-async">
<title>The @Async Annotation</title>
<para>The @Async annotation can be provided on a method so that
invocation of that method will occur asynchronously. In other words,
the caller will return immediately upon invocation and the actual
execution of the method will occur in a task that has been submitted to
a Spring TaskExecutor. In the simplest case, the annotation may be
applied to a void-returning method.</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[@Async
void doSomething() {
// this will be executed asynchronously
}]]></programlisting>
<para>Unlike the methods annotated with the @Scheduled annotation,
these methods can expect arguments, because they will be invoked
in the "normal" way by callers at runtime rather than from a
scheduled task being managed by the container. For example, the
following is a legitimate application of the @Async annotation.
</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[@Async
void doSomething(String s) {
// this will be executed asynchronously
}]]></programlisting>
<para>Even methods that return a value can be invoked asynchronously.
However, such methods are required to have a Future typed return value.
This still provides the benefit of asynchronous execution so that the
caller can perform other tasks prior to calling 'get()' on that Future.
</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[@Async
Future<String> returnSomething(int i) {
// this will be executed asynchronously
}]]></programlisting>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-annotation-support-namespace">
<title>The &lt;annotation-driven&gt; Element</title>
<para>To enable both @Scheduled and @Async annotations, simply
include the 'annotation-driven' element from the task namespace in
your configuration.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<task:annotation-driven executor="myExecutor" scheduler="myScheduler"/>
<task:executor id="myExecutor" pool-size="5"/>
<task:scheduler id="myScheduler" pool-size="10"/>}]]></programlisting>
<para>Notice that an executor reference is provided for handling
those tasks that correspond to methods with the @Async annotation,
and the scheduler reference is provided for managing those methods
annotated with @Scheduled.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-quartz">
<title>Using the OpenSymphony Quartz Scheduler</title>
<para>Quartz uses <classname>Trigger</classname>, <classname>Job</classname> and
<classname>JobDetail</classname> objects to realize scheduling of all kinds of jobs.
For the basic concepts behind Quartz, have a look at
<ulink url="http://www.opensymphony.com/quartz" />. For convenience purposes,
Spring offers a couple of classes that simplify the usage of Quartz within
Spring-based applications.
</para>
<section id="scheduling-quartz-jobdetail">
<title>Using the JobDetailBean</title>
<para>
<classname>JobDetail</classname> objects contain all information needed to
run a job. The Spring Framework provides a <classname>JobDetailBean</classname>
that makes the <classname>JobDetail</classname> more of an actual JavaBean
with sensible defaults. Let's have a look at an example:
</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[
<bean name="exampleJob" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.JobDetailBean">
<property name="jobClass" value="example.ExampleJob" />
<property name="jobDataAsMap">
<map>
<entry key="timeout" value="5" />
</map>
</property>
</bean>]]></programlisting>
<para>The job detail bean has all information it needs to run the job (<classname>ExampleJob</classname>).
The timeout is specified in the job data map. The job data map is
available through the <classname>JobExecutionContext</classname>
(passed to you at execution time), but the <classname>JobDetailBean</classname>
also maps the properties from the job data map to properties of the actual job.
So in this case, if the <classname>ExampleJob</classname> contains a property
named <literal>timeout</literal>, the <classname>JobDetailBean</classname> will
automatically apply it:</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[package example;
public class ExampleJob extends QuartzJobBean {
private int timeout;
/**
* Setter called after the ExampleJob is instantiated
* with the value from the JobDetailBean (5)
*/
public void setTimeout(int timeout) {
this.timeout = timeout;
}
protected void executeInternal(JobExecutionContext ctx) throws JobExecutionException {
]]><lineannotation>// do the actual work</lineannotation><![CDATA[
}
}]]></programlisting>
<para>All additional settings from the job detail bean are of course available to you as well.</para>
<para><emphasis>Note: Using the <literal>name</literal> and <literal>group</literal> properties,
you can modify the name and the group of the job, respectively. By default, the name of
the job matches the bean name of the job detail bean (in the example above, this is
<literal>exampleJob</literal>).</emphasis></para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-quartz-method-invoking-job">
<title>Using the <classname>MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean</classname></title>
<para>Often you just need to invoke a method on a specific object. Using the
<classname>MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean</classname> you can do exactly this:</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<bean id="jobDetail" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean">
<property name="targetObject" ref="exampleBusinessObject" />
<property name="targetMethod" value="doIt" />
</bean>]]></programlisting>
<para>The above example will result in the <literal>doIt</literal> method being called on the
<literal>exampleBusinessObject</literal> method (see below):</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[public class ExampleBusinessObject {
]]><lineannotation>// properties and collaborators</lineannotation><![CDATA[
public void doIt() {
]]><lineannotation>// do the actual work</lineannotation><![CDATA[
}
}]]></programlisting>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[
<bean id="exampleBusinessObject" class="examples.ExampleBusinessObject"/>]]></programlisting>
<para>Using the <classname>MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean</classname>, you don't need to
create one-line jobs that just invoke a method, and you only need to create the actual
business object and wire up the detail object.</para>
<para>By default, Quartz Jobs are stateless, resulting in the possibility of jobs interfering
with each other. If you specify two triggers for the same <classname>JobDetail</classname>,
it might be possible that before the first job has finished, the second one will start.
If <classname>JobDetail</classname> classes implement the
<interfacename>Stateful</interfacename> interface, this won't happen. The second job
will not start before the first one has finished. To make jobs resulting from the
<classname>MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean</classname> non-concurrent, set the
<literal>concurrent</literal> flag to <literal>false</literal>.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[
<bean id="jobDetail" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean">
<property name="targetObject" ref="exampleBusinessObject" />
<property name="targetMethod" value="doIt" />
<property name="concurrent" value="false" />
</bean>]]></programlisting>
<note>
<para>By default, jobs will run in a concurrent fashion.</para>
</note>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-quartz-cron">
<title>Wiring up jobs using triggers and the <classname>SchedulerFactoryBean</classname></title>
<para>
We've created job details and jobs. We've also reviewed the convenience bean
that allows to you invoke a method on a specific object. Of course, we still need
to schedule the jobs themselves. This is done using triggers and a
<classname>SchedulerFactoryBean</classname>. Several triggers are available
within Quartz. Spring offers two subclassed triggers with convenient defaults:
<classname>CronTriggerBean</classname> and <classname>SimpleTriggerBean</classname>.
</para>
<para>
Triggers need to be scheduled. Spring offers a <classname>SchedulerFactoryBean</classname>
that exposes triggers to be set as properties. <classname>SchedulerFactoryBean</classname>
schedules the actual jobs with those triggers.
</para>
<para>Find below a couple of examples:</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<bean id="simpleTrigger" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.SimpleTriggerBean">
<!-- see the example of method invoking job above -->
<property name="jobDetail" ref="jobDetail" />
<!-- 10 seconds -->
<property name="startDelay" value="10000" />
<!-- repeat every 50 seconds -->
<property name="repeatInterval" value="50000" />
</bean>
<bean id="cronTrigger" class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.CronTriggerBean">
<property name="jobDetail" ref="exampleJob" />
<!-- run every morning at 6 AM -->
<property name="cronExpression" value="0 0 6 * * ?" />
</bean>]]></programlisting>
<para>Now we've set up two triggers, one running every 50 seconds with a starting delay of
10 seconds and one every morning at 6 AM. To finalize everything, we need to set up the
<classname>SchedulerFactoryBean</classname>:</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<bean class="org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.SchedulerFactoryBean">
<property name="triggers">
<list>
<ref bean="cronTrigger" />
<ref bean="simpleTrigger" />
</list>
</property>
</bean>]]></programlisting>
<para>
More properties are available for the <classname>SchedulerFactoryBean</classname> for you
to set, such as the calendars used by the job details, properties to customize Quartz with,
etc. Have a look at the
<ulink url="http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.5.x/api/org/springframework/scheduling/quartz/SchedulerFactoryBean.html">SchedulerFactoryBean Javadoc</ulink>
for more information.
</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-jdk-timer">
<title>Using JDK Timer support</title>
<para>
The other way to schedule jobs in Spring is to use JDK
<classname>Timer</classname> objects. You can create custom timers or
use the timer that invokes methods. Wiring timers is done using the
<classname>TimerFactoryBean</classname>.
</para>
<section id="scheduling-jdk-timer-creating">
<title>Creating custom timers</title>
<para>
Using the <classname>TimerTask</classname> you can create customer
timer tasks, similar to Quartz jobs:
</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[public class CheckEmailAddresses extends TimerTask {
private List emailAddresses;
public void setEmailAddresses(List emailAddresses) {
this.emailAddresses = emailAddresses;
}
public void run() {
]]><lineannotation>// iterate over all email addresses and archive them</lineannotation><![CDATA[
}
}]]></programlisting>
<para>
Wiring it up is simple:
</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<bean id="checkEmail" class="examples.CheckEmailAddress">
<property name="emailAddresses">
<list>
<value>test@springframework.org</value>
<value>foo@bar.com</value>
<value>john@doe.net</value>
</list>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="scheduledTask" class="org.springframework.scheduling.timer.ScheduledTimerTask">
]]><lineannotation>&lt;!-- wait 10 seconds before starting repeated execution --&gt;</lineannotation><![CDATA[
<property name="delay" value="10000" />
]]><lineannotation>&lt;!-- run every 50 seconds --&gt;</lineannotation><![CDATA[
<property name="period" value="50000" />
<property name="timerTask" ref="checkEmail" />
</bean>]]></programlisting>
<para>
<emphasis>
Note that letting the task only run once can be done by changing the
<literal>period</literal> property to 0 (or a negative value).
</emphasis>
</para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-jdk-timer-method-invoking-task">
<title>Using the <classname>MethodInvokingTimerTaskFactoryBean</classname></title>
<para>
Similar to the Quartz support, the <classname>Timer</classname> support also features
a component that allows you to periodically invoke a method:
</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<bean id="doIt" class="org.springframework.scheduling.timer.MethodInvokingTimerTaskFactoryBean">
<property name="targetObject" ref="exampleBusinessObject" />
<property name="targetMethod" value="doIt" />
</bean>]]></programlisting>
<para>
The above example will result in the <literal>doIt</literal> method being called on the
<literal>exampleBusinessObject</literal> (see below):
</para>
<programlisting language="java"><![CDATA[public class BusinessObject {
]]><lineannotation>// properties and collaborators</lineannotation><![CDATA[
public void doIt() {
]]><lineannotation>// do the actual work</lineannotation><![CDATA[
}
}]]></programlisting>
<para>Changing the <literal>timerTask</literal> reference of the
<classname>ScheduledTimerTask</classname> example to the bean <literal>doIt</literal>
will result in the <literal>doIt</literal> method being executed on a fixed schedule.</para>
</section>
<section id="scheduling-jdk-timer-factory-bean">
<title>Wrapping up: setting up the tasks using the <classname>TimerFactoryBean</classname></title>
<para>The <classname>TimerFactoryBean</classname> is similar to the Quartz
<classname>SchedulerFactoryBean</classname> in that it serves the same
purpose: setting up the actual scheduling. The <classname>TimerFactoryBean</classname>
sets up an actual <classname>Timer</classname> and schedules the tasks it has
references to. You can specify whether or not daemon threads should be used.</para>
<programlisting language="xml"><![CDATA[<bean id="timerFactory" class="org.springframework.scheduling.timer.TimerFactoryBean">
<property name="scheduledTimerTasks">
<list>
]]><lineannotation>&lt;!-- see the example above --&gt;</lineannotation><![CDATA[
<ref bean="scheduledTask" />
</list>
</property>
</bean>]]></programlisting>
</section>
</section>
</chapter>