Fix inline code formatting in documentation
CI / Build (17, ubuntu-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Build (17, windows-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Test Against Snapshots (17, 17) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Test Against Snapshots (21-ea, 21) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Check Samples (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Deploy Artifacts (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Deploy Docs (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Deploy Schema (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Perform Release (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Send Notification (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
Deploy Docs / build (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Build (17, ubuntu-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Build (17, windows-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Test Against Snapshots (17, 17) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Test Against Snapshots (21-ea, 21) (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Check Samples (push) Waiting to run
Details
CI / Deploy Artifacts (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Deploy Docs (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Deploy Schema (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Perform Release (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
CI / Send Notification (push) Blocked by required conditions
Details
Deploy Docs / build (push) Waiting to run
Details
Signed-off-by: Hao <kyrieeeee2@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c7d2e8922
commit
6159e089d4
|
@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ class TenantJWSKeySelector(tenants: TenantRepository) : JWTClaimsSetAwareJWSKeyS
|
|||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
<1> A hypothetical source for tenant information
|
||||
<2> A cache for `JWSKeySelector`s, keyed by tenant identifier
|
||||
<2> A cache for ``JWSKeySelector``s, keyed by tenant identifier
|
||||
<3> Looking up the tenant is more secure than simply calculating the JWK Set endpoint on the fly - the lookup acts as a list of allowed tenants
|
||||
<4> Create a `JWSKeySelector` via the types of keys that come back from the JWK Set endpoint - the lazy lookup here means that you don't need to configure all tenants at startup
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ class MyCustomSecurityConfiguration {
|
|||
----
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
In this way, the set of `RelyingPartyRegistration`s will refresh based on {spring-framework-reference-url}integration/cache/store-configuration.html[the cache's eviction schedule].
|
||||
In this way, the set of ``RelyingPartyRegistration``s will refresh based on {spring-framework-reference-url}integration/cache/store-configuration.html[the cache's eviction schedule].
|
||||
|
||||
[[servlet-saml2login-relyingpartyregistration]]
|
||||
== RelyingPartyRegistration
|
||||
|
@ -971,9 +971,9 @@ As seen so far, Spring Security resolves the `RelyingPartyRegistration` by looki
|
|||
Depending on the use case, a number of other strategies are also employed to derive one.
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
|
||||
* For processing `<saml2:Response>`s, the `RelyingPartyRegistration` is looked up from the associated `<saml2:AuthRequest>` or from the `<saml2:Response#Issuer>` element
|
||||
* For processing `<saml2:LogoutRequest>`s, the `RelyingPartyRegistration` is looked up from the currently logged in user or from the `<saml2:LogoutRequest#Issuer>` element
|
||||
* For publishing metadata, the `RelyingPartyRegistration`s are looked up from any repository that also implements `Iterable<RelyingPartyRegistration>`
|
||||
* For processing ``<saml2:Response>``s, the `RelyingPartyRegistration` is looked up from the associated `<saml2:AuthRequest>` or from the `<saml2:Response#Issuer>` element
|
||||
* For processing ``<saml2:LogoutRequest>``s, the `RelyingPartyRegistration` is looked up from the currently logged in user or from the `<saml2:LogoutRequest#Issuer>` element
|
||||
* For publishing metadata, the ``RelyingPartyRegistration``s are looked up from any repository that also implements `Iterable<RelyingPartyRegistration>`
|
||||
|
||||
When this needs adjustment, you can turn to the specific components for each of these endpoints targeted at customizing this:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue