165 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			165 lines
		
	
	
		
			8.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
| ---
 | |
| stage: none
 | |
| group: unassigned
 | |
| info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
 | |
| ---
 | |
| 
 | |
| # How to update GitLab documentation
 | |
| 
 | |
| Anyone can contribute to the GitLab documentation! You can create a merge request for documentation when:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - You find errors or other room for improvement in existing documentation.
 | |
| - You have an idea for all-new documentation that would help a GitLab user or administrator to
 | |
|   accomplish their work with GitLab.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are working on a feature or enhancement, use the
 | |
| [feature workflow process described in the GitLab Handbook](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/workflow/#for-a-product-change).
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## How to update the docs
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are not a GitLab team member, or do not have the Developer role for the GitLab repository, to update GitLab documentation:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Select an issue you'd like to work on.
 | |
|    - You don't need an issue to open a merge request.
 | |
|    - For a Hackathon, in the issue, in a comment, mention the person who opened the issue and ask for the issue to be assigned to you.
 | |
|      To be fair to other contributors, if you see someone has already asked to work on the issue, choose another issue.
 | |
|      If you are looking for issues to work on and don't see any that suit you, you can always fix [Vale](testing.md#vale) issues.
 | |
| 1. Go to the [GitLab repository](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab).
 | |
| 1. In the top-right, select **Fork**. Forking makes a copy of the repository on GitLab.com.
 | |
| 1. In your fork, find the documentation page by going to the `\doc` directory.
 | |
| 1. If you know Git, make your changes and open a merge request.
 | |
|    If not, follow these steps:
 | |
|    1. In the top right, select **Edit**, make the changes, and **Save**.
 | |
|    1. From the left menu, select **Merge requests**.
 | |
|    1. For the source branch, select your fork and branch. If you did not create a branch, select `master`.
 | |
|       For the target branch, select the [GitLab repository](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab) `master` branch.
 | |
|    1. For the commit message, use 3-5 words, start with a capital letter, and do not end with a period.
 | |
|    1. Select **Commit changes**. A merge request opens.
 | |
|    1. Select the **Documentation** template. In the description, write a brief summary of the changes and link to the related issue, if there is one.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you need help while working on the page, view:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The [Style Guide](styleguide/index.md).
 | |
| - The [Word list](styleguide/word_list.md)
 | |
| - The [Markdown Guide](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/markdown-guide/).
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Ask for help
 | |
| 
 | |
| Ask for help from the Technical Writing team if you:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Need help to choose the correct place for documentation.
 | |
| - Want to discuss a documentation idea or outline.
 | |
| - Want to request any other help.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To identify someone who can help you:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Locate the Technical Writer for the relevant
 | |
|    [DevOps stage group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments).
 | |
| 1. Either:
 | |
|    - If urgent help is required, directly assign the Technical Writer in the issue or in the merge request.
 | |
|    - If non-urgent help is required, ping the Technical Writer in the issue or merge request.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are a member of the GitLab Slack workspace, you can request help in `#docs`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Documentation labels
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you author an issue or merge request, you must add these labels:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - A [type label](../contributing/issue_workflow.md#type-labels).
 | |
| - A [stage label](../contributing/issue_workflow.md#stage-labels) and [group label](../contributing/issue_workflow.md#group-labels).
 | |
|   For example, `~devops::create` and `~group::source code`.
 | |
| - A `~documentation` [specialization label](../contributing/issue_workflow.md#specialization-labels).
 | |
| 
 | |
| A member of the Technical Writing team adds these labels:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - A [documentation scoped label](../../user/project/labels.md#scoped-labels) with the
 | |
|   `docs::` prefix. For example, `~docs::improvement`.
 | |
| - The [`~Technical Writing` team label](../contributing/issue_workflow.md#team-labels).
 | |
| - A type label: either `~"type::feature"` or `~"type::maintenance"`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Reviewing and merging
 | |
| 
 | |
| Anyone with the Maintainer role to the relevant GitLab project can
 | |
| merge documentation changes. Maintainers must make a good-faith effort to ensure that the content:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Is clear and sufficiently easy for the intended audience to navigate and understand.
 | |
| - Meets the [Documentation Guidelines](index.md) and [Style Guide](styleguide/index.md).
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the author or reviewer has any questions, they can mention the writer who is assigned to the relevant
 | |
| [DevOps stage group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments).
 | |
| 
 | |
| The process involves the following:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Primary Reviewer. Review by a [code reviewer](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/projects/)
 | |
|   or other appropriate colleague to confirm accuracy, clarity, and completeness. This can be skipped
 | |
|   for minor fixes without substantive content changes.
 | |
| - Technical Writer (Optional). If not completed for a merge request before merging, must be scheduled
 | |
|   post-merge. Schedule post-merge reviews only if an urgent merge is required. To request a:
 | |
|   - Pre-merge review, assign the Technical Writer listed for the applicable
 | |
|     [DevOps stage group](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments).
 | |
|   - Post-merge review, see [Post-merge reviews](#post-merge-reviews).
 | |
| - Maintainer. For merge requests, Maintainers:
 | |
|   - Can always request any of the above reviews.
 | |
|   - Review before or after a Technical Writer review.
 | |
|   - Ensure the given release milestone is set.
 | |
|   - Ensure the appropriate labels are applied, including any required to pick a merge request into
 | |
|     a release.
 | |
|   - Ensure that, if there has not been a Technical Writer review completed or scheduled, they
 | |
|     [create the required issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/new?issuable_template=Doc%20Review), assign it to the Technical Writer of the given stage group,
 | |
|     and link it from the merge request.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The process is reflected in the **Documentation**
 | |
| [merge request template](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/.gitlab/merge_request_templates/Documentation.md).
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Other ways to help
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you have ideas for further documentation resources please
 | |
| [create an issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/new?issuable_template=Documentation)
 | |
| using the Documentation template.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Post-merge reviews
 | |
| 
 | |
| If not assigned to a Technical Writer for review prior to merging, a review must be scheduled
 | |
| immediately after merge by the developer or maintainer. For this,
 | |
| create an issue using the [Doc Review description template](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/new?issuable_template=Doc%20Review)
 | |
| and link to it from the merged merge request that introduced the documentation change.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Circumstances in which a regular pre-merge Technical Writer review might be skipped include:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - There is a short amount of time left before the milestone release. If fewer than three
 | |
|  days are remaining, seek a post-merge review and ping the writer via Slack to ensure the review is
 | |
|   completed as soon as possible.
 | |
| - The size of the change is small and you have a high degree of confidence
 | |
|   that early users of the feature (for example, GitLab.com users) can easily
 | |
|   use the documentation as written.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Remember:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - At GitLab, we treat documentation like code. As with code, documentation must be reviewed to
 | |
|   ensure quality.
 | |
| - Documentation forms part of the GitLab [definition of done](../contributing/merge_request_workflow.md#definition-of-done).
 | |
| - That pre-merge Technical Writer reviews should be most common when the code is complete well in
 | |
|   advance of a milestone release and for larger documentation changes.
 | |
| - You can request a post-merge Technical Writer review of documentation if it's important to get the
 | |
|   code with which it ships merged as soon as possible. In this case, the author of the original MR
 | |
|   can address the feedback provided by the Technical Writer in a follow-up MR.
 | |
| - The Technical Writer can also help decide that documentation can be merged without Technical
 | |
|   writer review, with the review to occur soon after merge.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Before merging
 | |
| 
 | |
| Ensure the following if skipping an initial Technical Writer review:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - [Product badges](styleguide/index.md#product-tier-badges) are applied.
 | |
| - The GitLab [version](styleguide/index.md#gitlab-versions) that
 | |
|   introduced the feature is included.
 | |
| - Changes to headings don't affect in-app hyperlinks.
 | |
| - Specific [user permissions](../../user/permissions.md) are documented.
 | |
| - New documents are linked from higher-level indexes, for discoverability.
 | |
| - The style guide is followed:
 | |
|   - For [directories and files](site_architecture/folder_structure.md).
 | |
|   - For [images](styleguide/index.md#images).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Merge requests that change the location of documentation must always be reviewed by a Technical
 | |
| Writer before merging.
 |