Although the previous commit is enough to fix the immediate cause of the
stochastic failure on Windows, this is a more resilient fix; make sure
we only inject a given frame into the correct packet type for our
various injection functions.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22578)
(cherry picked from commit 660718ee5b)
The QUIC fault injector frame injection functionality injects injected
frames on whatever EL we happen to be using to generate a packet in.
This means we sometimes inject the frame into a packet type it is not
allowed to be in, causing a different error code to be generated.
Fix this by making sure the connection is fully established before
trying to generate the frame in question.
Fixes#22348.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22578)
(cherry picked from commit a6eb287a66)
The txp->want_ack value has different bit values for different pn_space
values. Make sure we take that into account when we read it.
Fixes#22568
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22579)
(cherry picked from commit d13488b936)
Update makefile and fix some signedness issues in the demo sources.
Drop stray "\n" in the host-port format string that prevented ddd-01
from working (this was also noticed by Neil H). Also, determine the
length of the message we are sending and send that many bytes (rather
than send sizeof the buffer storing the message).
These changes are part of https://github.com/openssl/project/issues/253
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22542)
(cherry picked from commit d1338fcf12)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22569)
(cherry picked from commit b119f8b892)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22569)
(cherry picked from commit 266528965f)
Previously we entered an infinite loop if these things failed.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22557)
(cherry picked from commit ddf84fc47e)
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22499)
(cherry picked from commit dfb26e03c2)
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22499)
(cherry picked from commit d05e0e40d7)
Refer: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/39143 for a description
of the algorithm.
It is optimal in the sense of having:
* no divisions
* minimal number of blocks of random bits from the generator
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22499)
(cherry picked from commit 55755fbf42)
We should accept that many bytes without failing
Fixes#22551
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22558)
(cherry picked from commit 74ff15e1a1)
In digest_test_run() there are now 3 parameters possible plus
the sentinel value. In reality we will never use all three
at once but Coverity rightfully complains that it is possible
to overflow the params array.
Fixes Coverity 1548054
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22521)
(cherry picked from commit 497a7810bc)
We calculate the delay from the point that a packet arrives until it will
be counted as lost based on rtt info. Looking at all the packets we can
then calculate the earliest time that a packet will be counted as lost.
When that timer fires the latest rtt info may have changed and therefore
the packet may no longer be counted as lost yet.
We should not assume that just because the ackm timeout has fired that
there will definitely be lost packets.
Fixes#22538
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22541)
(cherry picked from commit 10dfd796c9)
When successful, ossl_X509_ALGOR_from_nid() returns a pointer to an
X509_ALGOR object. Inside ossl_X509_ALGOR_from_nid(),
X509_ALGOR_set0() is called, and this passes ownership of the ASN1
object "los" (label octet string) to the X509_ALGOR object. When
ossl_X509_ALGOR_from_nid() fails, ownership has not been passed on and
we need to free "los".
Change the scope of "los" and ensure it is freed on failure (on
success, set it to NULL so it is not freed inside the function).
Fixes#22336
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22495)
(cherry picked from commit 83efd7170b)
Point users at the actual guide, and also explain about LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22505)
(cherry picked from commit ada33e98f5)
We also add reference for ALPN ids
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22505)
(cherry picked from commit f666599f8d)
We move some of the "why QUIC" content into the guide and just provide a
summary in README-QUIC.md.
We also clarify how to use s_client with QUIC.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22505)
(cherry picked from commit 355fd1f45b)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22459)
(cherry picked from commit 0929814159)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22459)
(cherry picked from commit ae643b32f9)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22459)
(cherry picked from commit d7ad09da77)
Calling X509_NAME_print_ex with XN_FLAG_COMPAT falls back to calling
X509_NAME_print(). The obase parameter to X509_NAME_print() is not
used, so setting it to a different value has no effect.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19963)
(cherry picked from commit 2126ca3dba)
Similar to the bug fixed in 02db7354fe (Fix bug in X509_print_ex).
The error return value from X509_NAME_print_ex() is different
depending on whether the flags are XN_FLAG_COMPAT or not.
Apply a similar fix to what was done for X509_print_ex here as well.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19963)
(cherry picked from commit 2b5e028a2f)
The X509_FLAG_COMPAT constant is defined as a value of the
X509_print_ex() cflags argument, and so it should not be used
to compare against values for use with X509_NAME_print flags.
Use XN_FLAG_COMPAT, which has the same value, instead.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19963)
(cherry picked from commit da2dd3b51d)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit 8dc82c0255)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit b419fccad7)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit b9788ce6a8)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22470)
(cherry picked from commit 24844be16f)
Replace the random suffix with a counter, to make the
build reproducible.
Fixes#20954
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22415)
(cherry picked from commit 0fbc50ef0c)
Test case amended from code initially written by Bernd Edlinger.
Fixes#21110
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22421)
(cherry picked from commit af0025fc40)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22446)
(cherry picked from commit 62f8606a0a)
GCC toolchains on linux are not able to build libcrypto without linking
to libatomic as it does not have all needed atomics implemented as
intrinsics
Fixes errors like
| ld: ./libcrypto.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_is_lock_free'
CLA: trivial
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22460)
(cherry picked from commit d2e03c6034)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22504)
(cherry picked from commit f0d88b4d07)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22487)
(cherry picked from commit 4177999d27)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22487)
(cherry picked from commit e1559fbb53)
BLAKE2 is not really an extensible output function unlike SHAKE
as the digest size must be set during the context initialization.
Thus it makes no sense to use OSSL_DIGEST_PARAM_XOFLEN.
We also need to adjust EVP_DigestFinal_ex() to query the
OSSL_DIGEST_PARAM_SIZE as gettable ctx param for the size.
Fixes#22488
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22491)
ACKs are not restricted by CC so do not consider CC when determining
when we will emit an ACK.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22476)