Require all MQTT feature flags and remove their compatibility code:
* delete_ra_cluster_mqtt_node
* rabbit_mqtt_qos0_queue
* mqtt_v5
These feature flags were introduced in or before 3.13.0.
We don't need to duplicate so many patterns in so many
files since we have a monorepo (and want to keep it).
If I managed to miss something or remove something that
should stay, please put it back. Note that monorepo-wide
patterns should go in the top-level .gitignore file.
Other .gitignore files are for application or folder-
specific patterns.
Stats were not removed, including management UI stats
relating to FDs.
Web-MQTT and Web-STOMP configuration relating to FHC
were not removed.
The file_handle_cache itself must be kept until we
remove CQv1.
Fixes https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/pull/10761#discussion_r1528039577 :
"Could you please check a real condition that the old
version can't be used as part of this test?
is_mixed_versions() will still return true in 10 years
when testing RabbitMQ 21.x against 22.x. This function should
almost never be used."
The Web MQTT link is not used in the rabbitmq_mqtt Erlang app.
This link is only used in the rabbitmq_web_mqtt Erlang app.
Hence, move the link to the correct Erlang app.
When the Web-MQTT connection terminates early because of no supported
subprotocol, `terminate/3` called fhc release although no fhc obtain was
called yet. This was the case even when `use_file_handle_cache` was false,
because `#state.should_use_fhc` was not initialized.
Fixing this avoids the below harmless warning
```
[debug] error updating ets counter <0.1224.0> in table #Ref<0.2797411137.1366163457.189876>:
[{ets, update_counter,
[#Ref<0.2797411137.1366163457.189876>,
<0.1224.0>, {5, -1}],
...
[warning] FHC: failed to update counter 'obtained_socket', client pid: <0.1224.0>
```
When RabbitMQ enters maintenance mode / is being drained, all client
connections are closed.
This commit sends a DISCONNECT packet to (Web) MQTT 5.0 clients with
Reason Code "Server shutting down" before the connection is closed.
Previously, the Will Message could be kept in memory in the MQTT
connection process state. Upon termination, the Will Message is sent.
The new MQTT 5.0 feature Will Delay Interval requires storing the Will
Message outside of the MQTT connection process state.
The Will Message should not be stored node local because the client
could reconnect to a different node.
Storing the Will Message in Mnesia is not an option because we want to
get rid of Mnesia. Storing the Will Message in a Ra cluster or in Khepri
is only an option if the Will Payload is small as there is currently no
way in Ra to **efficiently** snapshot large binary data (Note that these
Will Messages are not consumed in a FIFO style workload like messages in
quorum queues. A Will Message needs to be stored for as long as the
Session lasts - up to 1 day by default, but could also be much longer if
RabbitMQ is configured with a higher maximum session expiry interval.)
Usually Will Payloads are small: They are just a notification that its
MQTT session ended abnormally. However, we don't know how users leverage
the Will Message feature. The MQTT protocol allows for large Will Payloads.
Therefore, the solution implemented in this commit - which should work
good enough - is storing the Will Message in a queue.
Each MQTT session which has a Session Expiry Interval and Will Delay
Interval of > 0 seconds will create a queue if the current Network
Connection ends where it stores its Will Message. The Will Message has a
message TTL set (corresponds to the Will Delay Interval) and the queue
has a queue TTL set (corresponds to the Session Expiry Interval).
If the client does not reconnect within the Will Delay Interval, the
message is dead lettered to the configured MQTT topic exchange
(amq.topic by default).
The Will Delay Interval can be set by both publishers and subscribers.
Therefore, the Will Message is the 1st session state that RabbitMQ keeps
for publish-only MQTT clients.
One current limitation of this commit is that a Will Message that is
delayed (i.e. Will Delay Interval is set) and retained (i.e. Will Retain
flag set) will not be retained.
One solution to retain delayed Will Messages is that the retainer
process consumes from a queue and the queue binds to the topic exchange
with a topic starting with `$`, for example `$retain/#`.
The AMQP 0.9.1 Will Message that is dead lettered could then be added a
CC header such that it won't not only be published with the Will Topic,
but also with `$retain` topic. For example, if the Will Topic is `a/b`,
it will publish with routing key `a/b` and CC header `$retain/a/b`.
The reason this is not implemented in this commit is that to keep the
currently broken retained message store behaviour, we would require
creating at least one queue per node and publishing only to that local
queue. In future, once we have a replicated retained message store based
on a Stream for example, we could just publish all retained messages to
the `$retain` topic and thefore into the Stream.
So, for now, we list "retained and delayed Will Messages" as a limitation
that they actually won't be retained.
- when clients connect with a duplicate client id;
disconnect with reason code session taken over 142
- when keep alive has timed out;
disconnect with reason code keep alive timeout 141
emqtt repos:
emqx/emqtt PR #196 is based on rabbitmq:otp-26-compatibility
emqx/emqtt PR #198 is based on ansd:master
rabbitmq/master contains both of these 2 PRs cherry-picked.
rabbitmq-server repos:
main branch points emqtt to rabbitmq:otp-26-compatibility
mqtt5 branch points emqtt to rabbitmq:master
Therefore, the current mqtt5 branch is OTP 26 compatible and can support
multiple subscription identifiers.
- "If the Server included a Maximum QoS in its CONNACK response
to a Client and it receives a PUBLISH packet with a QoS greater than this
then it uses DISCONNECT with Reason Code 0x9B (QoS not supported)"
- only affects mqtt v5, server max qos is 1
"Allow the Client and Server to independently specify the maximum
packet size they support. It is an error for the session partner
to send a larger packet."
This commit implements the part where the Server specifies the maximum
packet size.
"In the case of an error in a CONNECT packet it MAY send a CONNACK
packet containing the Reason Code, before closing the Network
Connection. In the case of an error in any other packet it SHOULD send a
DISCONNECT packet containing the Reason Code before closing the Network
Connection."
This commit implements only the "SHOULD" (second) part, not the "MAY"
(first) part.
There are now 2 different global wide MQTT settings on the server:
1. max_packet_size_unauthenticated which applies to the CONNECT packet
(and maybe AUTH packet in the future)
2. max_packet_size_authenticated which applies to all other MQTT
packets (that is, after the client successfully authenticated).
These two settings will apply to all MQTT versions.
In MQTT v5, if a non-CONNECT packet is too large, the server will send a
DISCONNECT packet to the client with Reason Code "Packet Too Large"
before closing the network connection.
As requested in https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/discussions/6331#discussioncomment-5796154
include all infos that were emitted in the MQTT connection created event also
in the MQTT connection closed event.
This ensures infos such as MQTT client ID are part of the connection
closed event.
Therefore, it's easy for the user to correlate between the two event
types.
Note that the MQTT plugin emits connection created and connection closed events only if
the CONNECT packet was successfully processed, i.e.authentication was successful.
Remove the disconnected_at property because it was never used.
rabbit_event already adds a timestamp to any event.
This change should be reverted once emqx/emqtt is OTP26 compatible.
Our fork/branch isn't either at this point, but at least partially
works. Let's use this branch for now to uncover server-side OTP26
incompatibilities (and continue working on OTP26 support for emqtt of
course).
Bazel build files are now maintained primarily with `bazel run
gazelle`. This will analyze and merge changes into the build files as
necessitated by certain code changes (e.g. the introduction of new
modules).
In some cases there hints to gazelle in the build files, such as `#
gazelle:erlang...` or `# keep` comments. xref checks on plugins that
depend on the cli are a good example.
David Ansari
Loïc Hoguin
Michal Kuratczyk
Rin Kuryloski
Michael Klishin
LoisSotoLopez
Lois Soto Lopez
Michael Klishin
Péter Gömöri
Loïc Hoguin
Chunyi Lyu
Rin Kuryloski
Iliia Khaprov
Michal Kuratczyk